FLavourite: Horizontal and Vertical Federated Learning Setting Comparison

Federated learning (FL) enables multiple organizations to collaboratively train AI models while keeping data separate. Depending on data distribution, FL can be set up horizontally (HFL) or vertically (VFL). When multi-modal data are already available in the same infrastructure, the choice of FL setting depends on the workload needs, such as level of privacy, evaluation metrics, and time-to-train. In this paper, we perform a qualitative and extensive evaluation of the HFL and VFL settings to provide guidance on how to choose a specific setting based on workload needs.We assess the classification of Alzheimer’s disease using non-independent and identically distributed (non-i.i.d.) 3D images and tabular data. The results demonstrate how, with the same aggregation function, HFL converges faster to higher accuracy and f1-score than VFL and demonstrate how HFL can be further improved due to a more flexible architecture. Finally, we provide practical considerations on when to choose which setting and share the implementations of the pipelines for reproducibility.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
IEEE Access
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2025.3569158
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Geophysical and Geoelectrical Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.73
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

FLavourite: Horizontal and Vertical Federated Learning Setting Comparison

Walter Riviera, Gloria Menegaz, Ilaria Boscolo Galazzo
2 citations
IEEE Access
Geophysical and Geoelectrical Methods
3.73
article

FLavourite: Horizontal and Vertical Federated Learning Setting Comparison

Walter Riviera, Gloria Menegaz, Ilaria Boscolo Galazzo
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Federated learning (FL) enables multiple organizations to collaboratively train AI models while keeping data separate. Depending on data distribution, FL can be set up horizontally (HFL) or vertically (VFL). When multi-modal data are already available in the same infrastructure, the choice of FL setting depends on the workload needs, such as level of privacy, evaluation metrics, and time-to-train. In this paper, we perform a qualitative and extensive evaluation of the HFL and VFL settings to provide guidance on how to choose a specific setting based on workload needs.We assess the classification of Alzheimer’s disease using non-independent and identically distributed (non-i.i.d.) 3D images and tabular data. The results demonstrate how, with the same aggregation function, HFL converges faster to higher accuracy and f1-score than VFL and demonstrate how HFL can be further improved due to a more flexible architecture. Finally, we provide practical considerations on when to choose which setting and share the implementations of the pipelines for reproducibility.

IEEE AccessVol. 13
University of Verona (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Geophysical and Geoelectrical Methods
3.73
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.