The Missing Ingredients for a Polycentric Governance System of Orbital Debris

Abstract The pollution of Earth’s orbits by debris represents a pressing environmental problem. Recognizing that geopolitical factors hinder the adoption of a multilateral solution, several experts advocate for a polycentric governance system, inspired by Elinor Ostrom’s work. This article assesses the viability of such a proposal. It finds that the global network of space organizations exhibits some of the structural characteristics of a polycentric system. However, arrangements concluded among these organizations fail to promote sustainability norms, and interviews with key stakeholders reveal the absence of several favorable factors for a sustainable polycentric governance system. The article concludes that a polycentric structure alone does not guarantee the emergence of sustainable governance. As orbital space is a relatively “easy case” for applying polycentricity theory to the global commons, this research serves as a reminder about the limitations of polycentric approaches in global environmental politics.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Global Environmental Politics
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1162/glep_a_00775
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Space exploration and regulation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.62

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Missing Ingredients for a Polycentric Governance System of Orbital Debris

Jean‐Frédéric Morin, Cynthia Couette
4 citations
Global Environmental Politics
Space exploration and regulation
4.62
article

The Missing Ingredients for a Polycentric Governance System of Orbital Debris

Jean‐Frédéric Morin, Cynthia Couette
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Abstract The pollution of Earth’s orbits by debris represents a pressing environmental problem. Recognizing that geopolitical factors hinder the adoption of a multilateral solution, several experts advocate for a polycentric governance system, inspired by Elinor Ostrom’s work. This article assesses the viability of such a proposal. It finds that the global network of space organizations exhibits some of the structural characteristics of a polycentric system. However, arrangements concluded among these organizations fail to promote sustainability norms, and interviews with key stakeholders reveal the absence of several favorable factors for a sustainable polycentric governance system. The article concludes that a polycentric structure alone does not guarantee the emergence of sustainable governance. As orbital space is a relatively “easy case” for applying polycentricity theory to the global commons, this research serves as a reminder about the limitations of polycentric approaches in global environmental politics.

Global Environmental PoliticsVol. 25(2)
Medical Protective (US), Schlumberger (Ireland) (IE)
George Washington University, Universiteit Utrecht, Radboud Universiteit, Universität Wien
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Space exploration and regulation
4.62
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.