Determining the Financial Solvency Level of Insurance Companies by Insurance Branches

This study aims to assess the financial solvency levels of insurance companies across different insurance branches by comparing solvency margin ratios (SMR) calculated using regulatory coefficients and actuarial risk assessments. The study employs a quantitative research design, analyzing the financial solvency of eight major insurance companies operating across multiple branches, including life, health, property, liability, aviation, and marine insurance. Data were collected from publicly available financial reports, solvency disclosures, and actuarial evaluations, following the solvency assessment guidelines outlined in regulatory frameworks such as Solvency I and Solvency II. The solvency margin ratio was calculated using the formula SMR = Available Capital ÷ Required Capital, with comparative analysis conducted to evaluate differences between regulatory and actuarial assessments across insurance branches. Descriptive analysis, ratio comparisons, and sensitivity analysis were employed to interpret the results. The results indicate significant discrepancies between regulatory and actuarial solvency assessments, with life insurance demonstrating the highest solvency ratios and aviation and marine insurance exhibiting the lowest solvency levels. The findings suggest that regulatory solvency assessments may underestimate financial risks in high-risk branches, whereas actuarial assessments provide a more comprehensive risk-sensitive evaluation. Companies with diversified portfolios and strong capital reserves generally demonstrated higher solvency ratios, emphasizing the importance of risk management and capital adequacy strategies in maintaining financial stability. The study highlights the necessity for a more refined regulatory framework that aligns with actuarial risk assessments to ensure accurate solvency evaluations and financial resilience. Insurance companies should integrate both regulatory and actuarial solvency models to enhance financial risk management, particularly in high-risk branches such as aviation and marine insurance, to strengthen financial sustainability.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Management Strategies and Engineering Sciences
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.61838/msesj.7.4.13
Primary Topic
Economic and Technological Systems Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Determining the Financial Solvency Level of Insurance Companies by Insurance Branches

Ghodratollah Emamverdi, Mohsen Hamidian, Melika Firouzi
Management Strategies and Engineering Sciences
Economic and Technological Systems Analysis
article

Determining the Financial Solvency Level of Insurance Companies by Insurance Branches

Ghodratollah Emamverdi, Mohsen Hamidian, Melika Firouzi
article en

Abstract

This study aims to assess the financial solvency levels of insurance companies across different insurance branches by comparing solvency margin ratios (SMR) calculated using regulatory coefficients and actuarial risk assessments. The study employs a quantitative research design, analyzing the financial solvency of eight major insurance companies operating across multiple branches, including life, health, property, liability, aviation, and marine insurance. Data were collected from publicly available financial reports, solvency disclosures, and actuarial evaluations, following the solvency assessment guidelines outlined in regulatory frameworks such as Solvency I and Solvency II. The solvency margin ratio was calculated using the formula SMR = Available Capital ÷ Required Capital, with comparative analysis conducted to evaluate differences between regulatory and actuarial assessments across insurance branches. Descriptive analysis, ratio comparisons, and sensitivity analysis were employed to interpret the results. The results indicate significant discrepancies between regulatory and actuarial solvency assessments, with life insurance demonstrating the highest solvency ratios and aviation and marine insurance exhibiting the lowest solvency levels. The findings suggest that regulatory solvency assessments may underestimate financial risks in high-risk branches, whereas actuarial assessments provide a more comprehensive risk-sensitive evaluation. Companies with diversified portfolios and strong capital reserves generally demonstrated higher solvency ratios, emphasizing the importance of risk management and capital adequacy strategies in maintaining financial stability. The study highlights the necessity for a more refined regulatory framework that aligns with actuarial risk assessments to ensure accurate solvency evaluations and financial resilience. Insurance companies should integrate both regulatory and actuarial solvency models to enhance financial risk management, particularly in high-risk branches such as aviation and marine insurance, to strengthen financial sustainability.

Management Strategies and Engineering SciencesVol. 7(4)
Islamic Azad University South Tehran Branch (IR), Islamic Azad University Central Tehran Branch (IR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 86%
Economic and Technological Systems Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.