Comparative Study between Laparoscopy and Open Procedure with Mesh Repair for Para-Umbilical Hernia

Background: Para-umbilical hernias, a part of the ventral hernias group, are identified close to or right of the umbilicus.Objective: To compare open and laparoscopic surgery with mesh by analyzing differences in complication rates, efficacy, and recurrence in handling paraumbilical hernias.Methods: This retrospective study was conducted at Al-Yarmouk Teaching Hospital and Al Arabi Privet Hospital in Baghdad, Iraq, on 40 patients with umbilical hernias.Forty patients were divided into two groups: 20 treated with open surgery and 20 treated with laparoscopic mesh tissue repair.Results: The open procedure group consisted of more males than the laparoscopic group, which had more females.There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of BMI.The medical history of the patients was the same, where they had hypertension 60 percent of the time and had laparoscopic repair 50% of the time.The incidence of diabetes mellitus, cardiovascular attack, renal failure, or hypothyroidism was not considerably different between the two groups.Of those in the open procedure group, 10% had multiple sclerosis, equalling 5% of the laparoscopic group; thus, there was no significant difference.Seventy% of the patients in the open procedure group had no postoperative complications, and only 25% in the laparoscopy group had no postoperative complications.There were differences in perioperative characteristics; however, the overall operative time was longer in the open group.However, the open procedure group had a higher rate of wound infection.The recurrence rates approached statistical significance at 20% for the open procedures and 10% for the laparoscopic procedures.Thus, the effectiveness of conversion in the two groups did not vary.Conclusion: Concerning the post-surgery effects, such as infection and hematoma, there is a clear indication that patients who undergo laparoscopic paraumbilical hernia repair procedures recover much faster than those who undergo an open procedure.Furthermore, most patients with para-umbilical hernia treated with hematoma and seroma are treated with aspiration.The current study and review results support the general premise that laparoscopic surgery may be superior to open surgery in minimizing complications and enhancing recovery, making it the best option for para-umbilical hernia repair.Predictive models must be further investigated to increase their reliability and update the surgical recommendations.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Surgery Gastroenterology and Oncology
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21614/sgo-738
Primary Topic
Hernia repair and management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Study between Laparoscopy and Open Procedure with Mesh Repair for Para-Umbilical Hernia

Nabaa Alazawy, Mustafa Usama Abdulmageed
Surgery Gastroenterology and Oncology
Hernia repair and management
article

Comparative Study between Laparoscopy and Open Procedure with Mesh Repair for Para-Umbilical Hernia

Nabaa Alazawy, Mustafa Usama Abdulmageed
article en

Abstract

Background: Para-umbilical hernias, a part of the ventral hernias group, are identified close to or right of the umbilicus.Objective: To compare open and laparoscopic surgery with mesh by analyzing differences in complication rates, efficacy, and recurrence in handling paraumbilical hernias.Methods: This retrospective study was conducted at Al-Yarmouk Teaching Hospital and Al Arabi Privet Hospital in Baghdad, Iraq, on 40 patients with umbilical hernias.Forty patients were divided into two groups: 20 treated with open surgery and 20 treated with laparoscopic mesh tissue repair.Results: The open procedure group consisted of more males than the laparoscopic group, which had more females.There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of BMI.The medical history of the patients was the same, where they had hypertension 60 percent of the time and had laparoscopic repair 50% of the time.The incidence of diabetes mellitus, cardiovascular attack, renal failure, or hypothyroidism was not considerably different between the two groups.Of those in the open procedure group, 10% had multiple sclerosis, equalling 5% of the laparoscopic group; thus, there was no significant difference.Seventy% of the patients in the open procedure group had no postoperative complications, and only 25% in the laparoscopy group had no postoperative complications.There were differences in perioperative characteristics; however, the overall operative time was longer in the open group.However, the open procedure group had a higher rate of wound infection.The recurrence rates approached statistical significance at 20% for the open procedures and 10% for the laparoscopic procedures.Thus, the effectiveness of conversion in the two groups did not vary.Conclusion: Concerning the post-surgery effects, such as infection and hematoma, there is a clear indication that patients who undergo laparoscopic paraumbilical hernia repair procedures recover much faster than those who undergo an open procedure.Furthermore, most patients with para-umbilical hernia treated with hematoma and seroma are treated with aspiration.The current study and review results support the general premise that laparoscopic surgery may be superior to open surgery in minimizing complications and enhancing recovery, making it the best option for para-umbilical hernia repair.Predictive models must be further investigated to increase their reliability and update the surgical recommendations.

Surgery Gastroenterology and OncologyVol. 30(1)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 82%
Hernia repair and management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.