The Justification Path of Data Localization Measures: An Analysis of the Application of the Public Policy Objective Exception in RCEP

随着信息技术的不断进步,数字贸易逐渐取代传统的贸易模式,而数据跨境流动作为数字贸易中的关键一环,引发了各国的重视,在国际贸易协定之中对其进行规定。我国作为缔约国之一的《区域全面经济伙伴关系协定》,原则上禁止数据本地化措施,但是设置了“公共政策目标”等例外条款。2024年3月22日,互联网信息办公室颁布的《促进和规范数据跨境传输规定》生效,其中明确特定数据种类采取数据本地化措施。因而我国数据本地化措施违背该协定的原则性的规定,但能否通过“公共政策目标”例外豁免仍需进一步分析。根据WTO专家组的实践,我国的数据本地化措施满足适用公共政策目标例外具有可行性,但由于我国目前的数据治理体系仍然存在缺陷,我国需要采取统一和细化数据分类标准,积极参与并主导制定国际数字经贸协定,并明确我国促进数据跨境流动的价值取向等措施,促进数据治理体系进一步完善,带动我国数字贸易的有序健康发展。With the continuous advancement of information technology, digital trade has gradually replaced traditional trade models, and cross-border data flow, as a key link in digital trade, has attracted the attention of various countries and has been stipulated in international trade agreements. As one of the signatories of the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP), China, in principle, prohibits data localization measures but has set up exception clauses such as “public policy objectives”. On March 22, 2024, the Regulations on Promoting and Regulating Cross-Border Data Transmission issued by the Cyberspace Administration of China came into effect, which clearly stipulates that certain types of data should adopt data localization measures. Therefore, China’s data localization measures violate the principle provisions of the agreement, but whether they can be exempted through the “public policy objective” exception still needs further analysis. According to the practice of the WTO expert group, China’s data localization measures are feasible to meet the application of the public policy objective exception. However, due to the current deficiencies in China’s data governance system, China needs to take measures such as unifying and refining data classification standards, actively participating in and leading the formulation of international digital trade agreements, and clarifying China’s value orientation for promoting cross-border data flow to further improve the data governance system and drive the orderly and healthy development of China’s digital trade.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Advances in Social Sciences
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.12677/ass.2025.145367
Primary Topic
Educational Reforms and Innovations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Justification Path of Data Localization Measures: An Analysis of the Application of the Public Policy Objective Exception in RCEP

汉 祁
Advances in Social Sciences
Educational Reforms and Innovations
article

The Justification Path of Data Localization Measures: An Analysis of the Application of the Public Policy Objective Exception in RCEP

汉 祁
article en

Abstract

随着信息技术的不断进步,数字贸易逐渐取代传统的贸易模式,而数据跨境流动作为数字贸易中的关键一环,引发了各国的重视,在国际贸易协定之中对其进行规定。我国作为缔约国之一的《区域全面经济伙伴关系协定》,原则上禁止数据本地化措施,但是设置了“公共政策目标”等例外条款。2024年3月22日,互联网信息办公室颁布的《促进和规范数据跨境传输规定》生效,其中明确特定数据种类采取数据本地化措施。因而我国数据本地化措施违背该协定的原则性的规定,但能否通过“公共政策目标”例外豁免仍需进一步分析。根据WTO专家组的实践,我国的数据本地化措施满足适用公共政策目标例外具有可行性,但由于我国目前的数据治理体系仍然存在缺陷,我国需要采取统一和细化数据分类标准,积极参与并主导制定国际数字经贸协定,并明确我国促进数据跨境流动的价值取向等措施,促进数据治理体系进一步完善,带动我国数字贸易的有序健康发展。With the continuous advancement of information technology, digital trade has gradually replaced traditional trade models, and cross-border data flow, as a key link in digital trade, has attracted the attention of various countries and has been stipulated in international trade agreements. As one of the signatories of the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP), China, in principle, prohibits data localization measures but has set up exception clauses such as “public policy objectives”. On March 22, 2024, the Regulations on Promoting and Regulating Cross-Border Data Transmission issued by the Cyberspace Administration of China came into effect, which clearly stipulates that certain types of data should adopt data localization measures. Therefore, China’s data localization measures violate the principle provisions of the agreement, but whether they can be exempted through the “public policy objective” exception still needs further analysis. According to the practice of the WTO expert group, China’s data localization measures are feasible to meet the application of the public policy objective exception. However, due to the current deficiencies in China’s data governance system, China needs to take measures such as unifying and refining data classification standards, actively participating in and leading the formulation of international digital trade agreements, and clarifying China’s value orientation for promoting cross-border data flow to further improve the data governance system and drive the orderly and healthy development of China’s digital trade.

Advances in Social SciencesVol. 14(05)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 87%
Educational Reforms and Innovations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.