Institute of Private Prosecution in Criminal Procedure of the Russian Federation and Some Recommendations for Vietnam

Criminal proceedings in Vietnam are characterized by significant limitations on the role of individual victims in the resolution of criminal cases. The achievement of justice in such cases is entirely dependent on the effectiveness of an integrated system built by investigators, pracurators, and judges. Meanwhile, through the institution of private prosecution, Russian legislation grants victims of crimes a defined role in the resolution of criminal cases. Within this framework, victims have a decisive voice in holding offenders accountable, ensuring a balanced integration of public and private interests in case resolution. This article conducts a legal analysis and comparative study to explore the nature and content of the private prosecution institution in the criminal procedure legislation of the Russian Federation. Based on this analysis, the article provides recommendations for Vietnam to improve the provisions of its Criminal Procedure Code, particularly concerning the role of victims in the resolution of criminal cases, in line with the requirements of judicial reform.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Juridical Science and Practice
Published
2025-05-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.25205/2542-0410-2025-21-1-78-88
Primary Topic
Education, Law, and Society
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Institute of Private Prosecution in Criminal Procedure of the Russian Federation and Some Recommendations for Vietnam

Mai Thanh Son
1 links
Juridical Science and Practice
Education, Law, and Society
article

Institute of Private Prosecution in Criminal Procedure of the Russian Federation and Some Recommendations for Vietnam

Mai Thanh Son
article en

Abstract

Criminal proceedings in Vietnam are characterized by significant limitations on the role of individual victims in the resolution of criminal cases. The achievement of justice in such cases is entirely dependent on the effectiveness of an integrated system built by investigators, pracurators, and judges. Meanwhile, through the institution of private prosecution, Russian legislation grants victims of crimes a defined role in the resolution of criminal cases. Within this framework, victims have a decisive voice in holding offenders accountable, ensuring a balanced integration of public and private interests in case resolution. This article conducts a legal analysis and comparative study to explore the nature and content of the private prosecution institution in the criminal procedure legislation of the Russian Federation. Based on this analysis, the article provides recommendations for Vietnam to improve the provisions of its Criminal Procedure Code, particularly concerning the role of victims in the resolution of criminal cases, in line with the requirements of judicial reform.

Juridical Science and PracticeVol. 21(1)
Vietnam National University Ho Chi Minh City (VN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 88%
Education, Law, and Society
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Institute of Private Prosecution in Criminal Procedure of the Russian Federation and Some Recommendations for Vietnam — Mai Thanh Son · Juridical Science and Practice (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS