Correction: Striking a Balance: Innovation, Equity, and Consistency in AI Health Technologies

With the explosion of innovation driven by generative and traditional AI, comes the necessity to understand and regulate products that often defy current regulatory classification. Tradition, and lack of regulatory expediency, imposes the notion of force fitting novel innovations into pre-existing product classifications or into the essentially unregulated domains of wellness and/or consumer electronics. Further, regulatory requirements, levels of risk tolerance, and capabilities vary greatly across the spectrum of technology innovators. For example, currently unregulated information and consumer electronic suppliers set their own editorial and communication standards without extensive federal regulation. However, industries like biopharma companies are held to a higher standard in the same space given current direct to consumer regulations that govern the interactions between biopharmaceutical companies, healthcare providers and patients, like the Sunshine Act (also known as Open Payments), the federal Anti-Kickback Statute (AKS), the federal False Claims Act (FCA) and others. Clear and well-defined regulations not only reduce ambiguity but facilitate scale, showcasing the importance of regulatory clarity in fostering innovation and growth. To avoid highly regulated industries like healthcare and biopharma from being discouraged from developing AI to improve patient care, there is a need for a specialized framework to establish regulatory evidence for AI-based medical solutions. In this paper, we review the current regulatory environment considering current innovations but also pre-existing legal and regulatory responsibilities of the biopharma industry and propose a novel, hybridized approach for the assessment of novel AI-based patient solutions. Further, we will elaborate the proposed concepts via case studies. This paper explores the challenges posed by the current regulatory environment, emphasizing the need for a specialized framework for AI medical devices. By reviewing existing regulations and proposing a hybridized approach, we aim to ensure that the potential of AI in biopharmaceutical innovation is not hindered by uneven regulatory landscapes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JMIR AI
Published
2025-05-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2196/76234
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Correction: Striking a Balance: Innovation, Equity, and Consistency in AI Health Technologies

Eric Perakslis, Tracy Tubb, Kimberly Nolen, Ethan Fricklas
JMIR AI
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
article

Correction: Striking a Balance: Innovation, Equity, and Consistency in AI Health Technologies

Eric Perakslis, Tracy Tubb, Kimberly Nolen, Ethan Fricklas
article en

Abstract

With the explosion of innovation driven by generative and traditional AI, comes the necessity to understand and regulate products that often defy current regulatory classification. Tradition, and lack of regulatory expediency, imposes the notion of force fitting novel innovations into pre-existing product classifications or into the essentially unregulated domains of wellness and/or consumer electronics. Further, regulatory requirements, levels of risk tolerance, and capabilities vary greatly across the spectrum of technology innovators. For example, currently unregulated information and consumer electronic suppliers set their own editorial and communication standards without extensive federal regulation. However, industries like biopharma companies are held to a higher standard in the same space given current direct to consumer regulations that govern the interactions between biopharmaceutical companies, healthcare providers and patients, like the Sunshine Act (also known as Open Payments), the federal Anti-Kickback Statute (AKS), the federal False Claims Act (FCA) and others. Clear and well-defined regulations not only reduce ambiguity but facilitate scale, showcasing the importance of regulatory clarity in fostering innovation and growth. To avoid highly regulated industries like healthcare and biopharma from being discouraged from developing AI to improve patient care, there is a need for a specialized framework to establish regulatory evidence for AI-based medical solutions. In this paper, we review the current regulatory environment considering current innovations but also pre-existing legal and regulatory responsibilities of the biopharma industry and propose a novel, hybridized approach for the assessment of novel AI-based patient solutions. Further, we will elaborate the proposed concepts via case studies. This paper explores the challenges posed by the current regulatory environment, emphasizing the need for a specialized framework for AI medical devices. By reviewing existing regulations and proposing a hybridized approach, we aim to ensure that the potential of AI in biopharmaceutical innovation is not hindered by uneven regulatory landscapes.

JMIR AIVol. 4
Family Health International 360 (US), Duke University (US), Pfizer (United States) (US), Clinical Research Institute (US), Durham County Department of Public Health (US)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 94%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.