Myers-Briggs typology from the perspective of classification of natural specializations

The article is devoted to a comparative analysis of the Myers-Briggs Typology (MBTI), based on psychological characteristics of personality, and the classification of natural specializations (CNS), based on neurophysiological features of the nervous system. The purpose of the study is to identify overlaps, differences, and possible ways of integration and development of these two concepts. On the basis of structural analysis, it was found that the dichotomy “extraversion/introversion” of MBTI corresponds to the dichotomy “concrete/abstract” of CNS. The main functions of MBTI (“sensing,” “intuition,” “thinking,” “feeling”) correspond with the classical specializations of CNS: Searcher, Analyst, Synthetic, and Realizator, respectively. The correlation of sixteen MBTI types with sixteen integral specializations of the CNS was established, which demonstrates the neurophysiological basis of each MBTI type, opening the way to a more objective diagnosis of the types through the methods of neurophysiology. The system comparison of MBTI and CNS demonstrates their structural similarity at different levels of content - psychological and biological. This allows us to consider the MBTI as a private, psychological level of the broader neurophysiological model of the CNS. MBTI and CNS, despite their different approaches and methodologies, describe the same underlying individual differences in humans.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Edelweiss Applied Science and Technology
Published
2025-05-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.55214/25768484.v9i5.7045
Primary Topic
Cognitive Science and Mapping
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Myers-Briggs typology from the perspective of classification of natural specializations

Aleksandr Ishkov
Edelweiss Applied Science and Technology
Cognitive Science and Mapping
article

Myers-Briggs typology from the perspective of classification of natural specializations

Aleksandr Ishkov
article en

Abstract

The article is devoted to a comparative analysis of the Myers-Briggs Typology (MBTI), based on psychological characteristics of personality, and the classification of natural specializations (CNS), based on neurophysiological features of the nervous system. The purpose of the study is to identify overlaps, differences, and possible ways of integration and development of these two concepts. On the basis of structural analysis, it was found that the dichotomy “extraversion/introversion” of MBTI corresponds to the dichotomy “concrete/abstract” of CNS. The main functions of MBTI (“sensing,” “intuition,” “thinking,” “feeling”) correspond with the classical specializations of CNS: Searcher, Analyst, Synthetic, and Realizator, respectively. The correlation of sixteen MBTI types with sixteen integral specializations of the CNS was established, which demonstrates the neurophysiological basis of each MBTI type, opening the way to a more objective diagnosis of the types through the methods of neurophysiology. The system comparison of MBTI and CNS demonstrates their structural similarity at different levels of content - psychological and biological. This allows us to consider the MBTI as a private, psychological level of the broader neurophysiological model of the CNS. MBTI and CNS, despite their different approaches and methodologies, describe the same underlying individual differences in humans.

Edelweiss Applied Science and TechnologyVol. 9(5)
Moscow State University of Civil Engineering (RU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 95%
Cognitive Science and Mapping
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.