How Leadership Transition Accountability Mechanisms Drive Environmental Governance Outcomes

This study investigates the impact of China’s “Audit of Outgoing Officials’ Natural Resource Asset Management” policy on urban environmental pollution. Utilizing a multi-period difference-in-differences (DID) model and panel data from 281 cities between 2011 and 2020, we find that the policy significantly reduces pollution. The mechanism analysis reveals that this reduction is primarily achieved through increased environmental penalties, while the effect of environmental aid is not significant. Additionally, heterogeneity analysis shows that the policy’s effectiveness varies with local industrial structure and population density, being more pronounced in cities with advanced industrial structures or lower population density. This research provides valuable insights into the role of government auditing in environmental governance and offers recommendations for optimizing policy design and implementation to maximize its environmental benefits and promote sustainable development.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Humanities and Social Sciences
Published
2025-04-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.54691/a7799m65
Primary Topic
Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How Leadership Transition Accountability Mechanisms Drive Environmental Governance Outcomes

Jinsong Hua, Liu Lin
Frontiers in Humanities and Social Sciences
Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
article

How Leadership Transition Accountability Mechanisms Drive Environmental Governance Outcomes

Jinsong Hua, Liu Lin
article en

Abstract

This study investigates the impact of China’s “Audit of Outgoing Officials’ Natural Resource Asset Management” policy on urban environmental pollution. Utilizing a multi-period difference-in-differences (DID) model and panel data from 281 cities between 2011 and 2020, we find that the policy significantly reduces pollution. The mechanism analysis reveals that this reduction is primarily achieved through increased environmental penalties, while the effect of environmental aid is not significant. Additionally, heterogeneity analysis shows that the policy’s effectiveness varies with local industrial structure and population density, being more pronounced in cities with advanced industrial structures or lower population density. This research provides valuable insights into the role of government auditing in environmental governance and offers recommendations for optimizing policy design and implementation to maximize its environmental benefits and promote sustainable development.

Frontiers in Humanities and Social SciencesVol. 5(4)
Jiangxi University of Finance and Economics (CN)
Jiangxi University of Finance and Economics
Openalex Percentile: Top 85%
Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.