Using the Hurwicz Criterion to Optimize Selection Queries Under Partial Ignorance

Optimizing queries in real-world situations under imperfect conditions is still a problem that has not been fully solved. We consider finding the optimal order in which to execute a given set of selection operators under partial ignorance of their selectivities. The selectivities are modeled as intervals rather than exact values and we apply various methods from decision theory in order to measure optimality. On the one hand, we evaluate the different techniques theoretically, showing which axioms of decision theory they satisfy and for which cases they efficiently provide an optimal solution. On the other hand, we also conduct an empirical evaluation, illustrating the differences of the approaches in terms of the relative error to the optimal solution. We demonstrate that a hybrid algorithm combining optimistic and pessimistic aspects performs best.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Semantic Computing
Published
2025-05-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1142/s1793351x25420061
Primary Topic
Multi-Criteria Decision Making
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Using the Hurwicz Criterion to Optimize Selection Queries Under Partial Ignorance

Sven Helmer, Peter T. Wood, Manuel Stuefer
International Journal of Semantic Computing
Multi-Criteria Decision Making
article

Using the Hurwicz Criterion to Optimize Selection Queries Under Partial Ignorance

Sven Helmer, Peter T. Wood, Manuel Stuefer
article en

Abstract

Optimizing queries in real-world situations under imperfect conditions is still a problem that has not been fully solved. We consider finding the optimal order in which to execute a given set of selection operators under partial ignorance of their selectivities. The selectivities are modeled as intervals rather than exact values and we apply various methods from decision theory in order to measure optimality. On the one hand, we evaluate the different techniques theoretically, showing which axioms of decision theory they satisfy and for which cases they efficiently provide an optimal solution. On the other hand, we also conduct an empirical evaluation, illustrating the differences of the approaches in terms of the relative error to the optimal solution. We demonstrate that a hybrid algorithm combining optimistic and pessimistic aspects performs best.

International Journal of Semantic ComputingVol. 19(02)
Free University of Bozen-Bolzano (IT), University of Zurich (CH), Birkbeck, University of London (GB)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
Multi-Criteria Decision Making
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.