Multispecies slavery–environment nexus in resource extraction and animals' ecological politics: Coercive donkey labour in Indian river sand mining

Abstract Coercive animal labour is central to capitalism, based on anthropocentric environmental ideologies that often regard animal bodies as solutions or fixes for often human‐caused environmental crises, even as, incrementally, it causes extreme ecological destruction. However, geographers and others have yet to focus on the ways in which coercive animal labour shapes, and is impacted by, environmental degradation and damage, despite growing critical work on the human slavery–environment nexus. Bringing animal labour and critical resource geographies together, this paper exposes the vulnerabilities and lived experiences of donkeys entrapped in river sand mining in regional Maharashtra and Uttar Pradesh, India, to probe the slavery–environment nexus through a multispecies approach. It expands the nascent work on animal capitalism in informal/grey economies of the Global South, to demonstrate how criminal economies organise the multispecies slavery–environment nexus through the maintenance of ‘low‐value’ human–animal labour relations in difficult environmental conditions, where precarious human labour relies on extreme extractions from animal bodies for survival. This paper calls for environmental, labour and critical resource geographers to extend existing work on the links between slavery and environmental destruction, through anti‐anthropocentric analyses that politically recognise (other) animals, and their vulnerabilities, specifically in being animal, a colonial‐anthropocentric ideology of animality as pejorative. Taking hope from radical (re)makings of worlds otherwise for these animals—empirical, political, even opportunistic—and however fleeting or frail, this paper proposes the articulation and development of an animals' ecological politics that refuses environmental anthropocentrism, and safeguards animal–nature relations in their fullest scope, specifically from human exploitation, as foundational to multispecies liberatory praxis.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers
Published
2025-05-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/tran.70017
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Geographies of human-animal interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
13.44

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Multispecies slavery–environment nexus in resource extraction and animals' ecological politics: Coercive donkey labour in Indian river sand mining

Yamini Narayanan
2 citations
Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers
Geographies of human-animal interactions
13.44
article

Multispecies slavery–environment nexus in resource extraction and animals' ecological politics: Coercive donkey labour in Indian river sand mining

Yamini Narayanan
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract Coercive animal labour is central to capitalism, based on anthropocentric environmental ideologies that often regard animal bodies as solutions or fixes for often human‐caused environmental crises, even as, incrementally, it causes extreme ecological destruction. However, geographers and others have yet to focus on the ways in which coercive animal labour shapes, and is impacted by, environmental degradation and damage, despite growing critical work on the human slavery–environment nexus. Bringing animal labour and critical resource geographies together, this paper exposes the vulnerabilities and lived experiences of donkeys entrapped in river sand mining in regional Maharashtra and Uttar Pradesh, India, to probe the slavery–environment nexus through a multispecies approach. It expands the nascent work on animal capitalism in informal/grey economies of the Global South, to demonstrate how criminal economies organise the multispecies slavery–environment nexus through the maintenance of ‘low‐value’ human–animal labour relations in difficult environmental conditions, where precarious human labour relies on extreme extractions from animal bodies for survival. This paper calls for environmental, labour and critical resource geographers to extend existing work on the links between slavery and environmental destruction, through anti‐anthropocentric analyses that politically recognise (other) animals, and their vulnerabilities, specifically in being animal, a colonial‐anthropocentric ideology of animality as pejorative. Taking hope from radical (re)makings of worlds otherwise for these animals—empirical, political, even opportunistic—and however fleeting or frail, this paper proposes the articulation and development of an animals' ecological politics that refuses environmental anthropocentrism, and safeguards animal–nature relations in their fullest scope, specifically from human exploitation, as foundational to multispecies liberatory praxis.

Transactions of the Institute of British GeographersVol. 50(4)
Deakin University (AU)
Australian Research Council
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Geographies of human-animal interactions
13.44
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.