RETURNING A CRIMINAL CASE TO THE PROSECUTOR AND BALANCING PUBLIC AND PRIVATE INTERESTS

Criminal proceedings, being public by their nature, require in civilised states a balance between public and private interests. The approaches of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation to determining this balance are not always accurately embodied by the legislator in newly adopted criminal procedural norms. In recent years, there has been a gradual strengthening of public principles and narrowing of the sphere of private interest in a number of institutions of criminal procedure law. This is illustrated by the legal institution of returning a criminal case to the prosecutor. Purpose: to analyse the norms of the legal institution of returning a criminal case to the prosecutor through the prism of the balance of private and public interests. Methods: comparative-legal, historical, legal-dogmatic and interpretation of legal norms. Results: the study allows to substantiate the thesis that the balance of private and public principles in criminal proceedings is a very mobile “substance”, which is under the influence of constantly developing social relations (objective factor) and requests of ruling elites (subjective factor); the article reveals the main trends in the establishment of this balance in the system of norms of the legal institution of returning a criminal case to the prosecutor.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The rule-of-law state theory and practice
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.33184/pravgos-2025.1.6
Primary Topic
Legal Systems and Judicial Processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

RETURNING A CRIMINAL CASE TO THE PROSECUTOR AND BALANCING PUBLIC AND PRIVATE INTERESTS

Elena Aleksandrovna ZAYTSEVA
The rule-of-law state theory and practice
Legal Systems and Judicial Processes
article

RETURNING A CRIMINAL CASE TO THE PROSECUTOR AND BALANCING PUBLIC AND PRIVATE INTERESTS

Elena Aleksandrovna ZAYTSEVA
article en

Abstract

Criminal proceedings, being public by their nature, require in civilised states a balance between public and private interests. The approaches of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation to determining this balance are not always accurately embodied by the legislator in newly adopted criminal procedural norms. In recent years, there has been a gradual strengthening of public principles and narrowing of the sphere of private interest in a number of institutions of criminal procedure law. This is illustrated by the legal institution of returning a criminal case to the prosecutor. Purpose: to analyse the norms of the legal institution of returning a criminal case to the prosecutor through the prism of the balance of private and public interests. Methods: comparative-legal, historical, legal-dogmatic and interpretation of legal norms. Results: the study allows to substantiate the thesis that the balance of private and public principles in criminal proceedings is a very mobile “substance”, which is under the influence of constantly developing social relations (objective factor) and requests of ruling elites (subjective factor); the article reveals the main trends in the establishment of this balance in the system of norms of the legal institution of returning a criminal case to the prosecutor.

The rule-of-law state theory and practice(1(79))
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 88%
Legal Systems and Judicial Processes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.