PROCEDURAL LIABILITY IN CRIMINAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDINGS: INTEGRATION PROSPECTS

The institution of procedural liability as a means of protecting procedural law has been formed to some extent in almost every procedural branch of law. At the same time, branch types of procedural liability have both individual features characteristic of a particular branch of law and general features inherent in this legal phenomenon as a whole. The main attention of researchers of procedural liability is directed precisely at problematic issues within individual procedural branches. At the same time, procedural liability is of special interest from the point of view of interbranch research, because such an approach on the basis of the revealed branch regularities of existence of this legal institution allows to develop its general basic principles and standards, to unify the conceptual apparatus, to develop measures to improve the legislation and judicial practice. This determines the relevance of this study. Purpose: to carry out a comparative interbranch analysis of the institution of procedural liability from the positions of doctrinal and law enforcement approaches. Methods: the methodological basis of the study is the unity of universal, general scientific and special-legal methods of legal science, including abstract-logical, comparative-legal, formal-legal, structural-functional. Results: the article reveals general approaches to the definition of the concept and content of procedural liability in such branches of law as criminal procedure and administrative procedure.  Based on the analysis of legislation, legal positions of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation and examples of judicial practice, the article substantiates the position that there are sufficient prerequisites for convergence and unification of the institution of procedural liability in criminal and administrative proceedings. On the basis of the fact that in criminal and administrative proceedings the issue of competition between procedural and substantive types of liability is solved in a similar way, the article concludes that it is necessary to develop problems of such significance precisely at the interbranch level.

Publication Details

Journal
The rule-of-law state theory and practice
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.33184/pravgos-2025.1.21
Primary Topic
Education, Law, and Society
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

PROCEDURAL LIABILITY IN CRIMINAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDINGS: INTEGRATION PROSPECTS

The rule-of-law state theory and practice
Education, Law, and Society
article

PROCEDURAL LIABILITY IN CRIMINAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDINGS: INTEGRATION PROSPECTS

article en

Abstract

The institution of procedural liability as a means of protecting procedural law has been formed to some extent in almost every procedural branch of law. At the same time, branch types of procedural liability have both individual features characteristic of a particular branch of law and general features inherent in this legal phenomenon as a whole. The main attention of researchers of procedural liability is directed precisely at problematic issues within individual procedural branches. At the same time, procedural liability is of special interest from the point of view of interbranch research, because such an approach on the basis of the revealed branch regularities of existence of this legal institution allows to develop its general basic principles and standards, to unify the conceptual apparatus, to develop measures to improve the legislation and judicial practice. This determines the relevance of this study. Purpose: to carry out a comparative interbranch analysis of the institution of procedural liability from the positions of doctrinal and law enforcement approaches. Methods: the methodological basis of the study is the unity of universal, general scientific and special-legal methods of legal science, including abstract-logical, comparative-legal, formal-legal, structural-functional. Results: the article reveals general approaches to the definition of the concept and content of procedural liability in such branches of law as criminal procedure and administrative procedure.  Based on the analysis of legislation, legal positions of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation and examples of judicial practice, the article substantiates the position that there are sufficient prerequisites for convergence and unification of the institution of procedural liability in criminal and administrative proceedings. On the basis of the fact that in criminal and administrative proceedings the issue of competition between procedural and substantive types of liability is solved in a similar way, the article concludes that it is necessary to develop problems of such significance precisely at the interbranch level.

The rule-of-law state theory and practice(1(79))
Openalex Percentile: Top 88%
Education, Law, and Society
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.