THE ABSENCE OF A HASH SUM AS A PROCEDURAL ERROR ARISING IN A FORENSIC EXAMINATION WHEN ANALYSING OBJECTS IN A DIGITAL FORM

An urgent task when working with digital objects is to comply with procedural rules and regulations in appointing a forensic examination and conducting research. Failure to comply with them leads to procedural errors, one of which is the failure to specify the hash sum of a digital file in the ruling on the appointment of the expert examination and in the expert report itself. Purpose: to analyse a procedural error committed by investigators and experts when describing a digital footprint; to identify the importance of specifying the hash sum as an identifying characteristic; to suggest ways of preventing this error. Methods: empirical methods of comparison, description, interpretation; theoretical methods of formal and dialectical logic. Results: the article reveals a procedural error associated with the illiterate description of a digital object sent for expert examination, and based on the analysis of judicial and expert practice the preconditions leading to its occurrence are identified; measures to prevent such errors are proposed.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The rule-of-law state theory and practice
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.33184/pravgos-2025.1.28
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Digital and Cyber Forensics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.25
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

THE ABSENCE OF A HASH SUM AS A PROCEDURAL ERROR ARISING IN A FORENSIC EXAMINATION WHEN ANALYSING OBJECTS IN A DIGITAL FORM

Seldjan Zaur qizi SHIKHALIYEVA
1 citations
The rule-of-law state theory and practice
Digital and Cyber Forensics
3.25
article

THE ABSENCE OF A HASH SUM AS A PROCEDURAL ERROR ARISING IN A FORENSIC EXAMINATION WHEN ANALYSING OBJECTS IN A DIGITAL FORM

Seldjan Zaur qizi SHIKHALIYEVA
article en
1 citations

Abstract

An urgent task when working with digital objects is to comply with procedural rules and regulations in appointing a forensic examination and conducting research. Failure to comply with them leads to procedural errors, one of which is the failure to specify the hash sum of a digital file in the ruling on the appointment of the expert examination and in the expert report itself. Purpose: to analyse a procedural error committed by investigators and experts when describing a digital footprint; to identify the importance of specifying the hash sum as an identifying characteristic; to suggest ways of preventing this error. Methods: empirical methods of comparison, description, interpretation; theoretical methods of formal and dialectical logic. Results: the article reveals a procedural error associated with the illiterate description of a digital object sent for expert examination, and based on the analysis of judicial and expert practice the preconditions leading to its occurrence are identified; measures to prevent such errors are proposed.

The rule-of-law state theory and practice(1(79))
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Digital and Cyber Forensics
3.25
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

THE ABSENCE OF A HASH SUM AS A PROCEDURAL ERROR ARISING IN A FORENSIC EXAMINATION WHEN ANALYSING OBJECTS IN A DIGITAL FORM — Seldjan Zaur qizi SHIKHALIYEVA · The rule-of-law state theory and practice (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS