PRIVATE AND PUBLIC INTERESTS IN PROCEEDINGS IN CRIMINAL CASES AND THE DIGITALISATION OF CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS

The development of modern technologies that penetrate all spheres of public life, including criminal proceedings, the digitalisation of criminal proceedings raises the issue of whether the technologies introduced and the changing interaction between participants in criminal proceedings are compatible with private and public interests realised in the course of criminal proceedings. The purpose of the article is to analyse the compliance of the process of implementation of modern digital technologies with private and public interests in criminal proceedings. Methods: comparative-legal, system analysis, synthesis, prognosis. The author concludes that from the perspective of private and public interests in criminal proceedings, a number of technologies introduced in criminal proceedings fully correspond to both, as they facilitate the possibility for participants in criminal proceedings to exercise their rights, increase their awareness, and they optimise and rationalise the process of criminal proceedings for the state.  However, a number of technologies are mainly in the public interest, as they optimise the activities of persons responsible for criminal proceedings, i.e., judges, investigators, prosecutors, and facilitate the work of authorised participants in the process. Artificial intelligence-based decision-making technologies in their current form do not serve either private or public interests, because they lack the emotional intelligence so necessary for resolving legal conflicts.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The rule-of-law state theory and practice
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.33184/pravgos-2025.1.7
Primary Topic
Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

PRIVATE AND PUBLIC INTERESTS IN PROCEEDINGS IN CRIMINAL CASES AND THE DIGITALISATION OF CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS

Oksana V. Kachalova
The rule-of-law state theory and practice
Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems
article

PRIVATE AND PUBLIC INTERESTS IN PROCEEDINGS IN CRIMINAL CASES AND THE DIGITALISATION OF CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS

Oksana V. Kachalova
article en

Abstract

The development of modern technologies that penetrate all spheres of public life, including criminal proceedings, the digitalisation of criminal proceedings raises the issue of whether the technologies introduced and the changing interaction between participants in criminal proceedings are compatible with private and public interests realised in the course of criminal proceedings. The purpose of the article is to analyse the compliance of the process of implementation of modern digital technologies with private and public interests in criminal proceedings. Methods: comparative-legal, system analysis, synthesis, prognosis. The author concludes that from the perspective of private and public interests in criminal proceedings, a number of technologies introduced in criminal proceedings fully correspond to both, as they facilitate the possibility for participants in criminal proceedings to exercise their rights, increase their awareness, and they optimise and rationalise the process of criminal proceedings for the state.  However, a number of technologies are mainly in the public interest, as they optimise the activities of persons responsible for criminal proceedings, i.e., judges, investigators, prosecutors, and facilitate the work of authorised participants in the process. Artificial intelligence-based decision-making technologies in their current form do not serve either private or public interests, because they lack the emotional intelligence so necessary for resolving legal conflicts.

The rule-of-law state theory and practice(1(79))
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 85%
Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.