Search Committee Members’ Perspectives on Diversity Statements in STEM Faculty Job Applications

ABSTRACT Faculty search committees use diversity statements as a component of job applications in an effort to increase the representation of racially and ethnically minoritized (REM) faculty members and to assess if prospective faculty members can contribute to an institutional culture that is respectful and supportive of all students, faculty, and staff, regardless of identity. In recent years, diversity statements have been politicized as loyalty oaths and some state laws have banned their use at public institutions of higher education, although some public institutions in other states and private institutions still require applicants to submit them. This paper presents an explanatory mixed methods study to answer the questions: (1) How prevalent are diversity statement requirements for STEM faculty hiring? (2) Do diversity statement requirements differ by institution type? (3) To what extent do universities equip search committees to evaluate diversity statements? We deployed a nationwide survey to STEM faculty members and administrators experienced in faculty search processes and conducted follow‐up interviews with a subset of respondents. Our results produced recommendations for both the effective use of diversity statements, and for academic leaders in states where they are not allowed, suggestions for evaluating faculty applicants’ ability to effectively collaborate with people and partners who have different backgrounds and perspectives.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
New Directions for Higher Education
Published
2025-05-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/he.20529
Primary Topic
Names, Identity, and Discrimination Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Search Committee Members’ Perspectives on Diversity Statements in STEM Faculty Job Applications

Yvette Pearson, Lisa J. Borello, Torrie A. Cropps, Samara Boyle et al.
New Directions for Higher Education
Names, Identity, and Discrimination Research
article

Search Committee Members’ Perspectives on Diversity Statements in STEM Faculty Job Applications

Yvette Pearson, Lisa J. Borello, Torrie A. Cropps, Samara Boyle, Stephen Mattingly, Canek Phillips, Jue Wu
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Faculty search committees use diversity statements as a component of job applications in an effort to increase the representation of racially and ethnically minoritized (REM) faculty members and to assess if prospective faculty members can contribute to an institutional culture that is respectful and supportive of all students, faculty, and staff, regardless of identity. In recent years, diversity statements have been politicized as loyalty oaths and some state laws have banned their use at public institutions of higher education, although some public institutions in other states and private institutions still require applicants to submit them. This paper presents an explanatory mixed methods study to answer the questions: (1) How prevalent are diversity statement requirements for STEM faculty hiring? (2) Do diversity statement requirements differ by institution type? (3) To what extent do universities equip search committees to evaluate diversity statements? We deployed a nationwide survey to STEM faculty members and administrators experienced in faculty search processes and conducted follow‐up interviews with a subset of respondents. Our results produced recommendations for both the effective use of diversity statements, and for academic leaders in states where they are not allowed, suggestions for evaluating faculty applicants’ ability to effectively collaborate with people and partners who have different backgrounds and perspectives.

New Directions for Higher EducationVol. 2025(212)
The University of Texas at Dallas (US), The University of Texas at Arlington (US), University of Florida (US), University of Kansas Medical Center (US), Rice University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 87%
Names, Identity, and Discrimination Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.