Search engine versus affective thought-guided chatbot for knowledge acquisition: the mediating roles of perceived social, expressive and diagnostic transparency and cognitive effort

Purpose This study aims to investigate the effects of different types of chatbots on knowledge learning performance and continuous usage intention by designing thought-guided and affective thought-guided chatbots. Drawing on coping theory, the study further seeks to uncover the underlying mechanism, focusing on perceptions of three nuanced aspects of transparency—social, expressive and diagnostic—and cognitive effort in human–artificial intelligence interactions. Design/methodology/approach Two experiments were conducted to investigate the impacts. A within-subjects experiment compared search engines and popular simple chatbots. A between-subjects experiment added thought-guided and affective thought-guided chatbots. Analysis of variance and partial least squares structural equation modeling were employed to analyze the differences and relationships. Findings Results indicate that, despite users’ initial preference for selecting chatbots, there are no differences in terms of knowledge learning performance and continuous usage intention between the search engine and the simple chatbot. Among the four tools for knowledge acquisition, the affective thought-guided chatbot achieves the best knowledge learning performance, and the thought-guided chatbot shows the lowest continuous usage intention. The mechanism test reveals that, compared to the search engine, the affective thought-guided chatbot increases users’ perceptions of all three aspects of transparency and cognitive effort. Whereas the thought-guided chatbot only increases perceived expressive transparency and cognitive effort. Furthermore, perceived expressive transparency and perceived diagnostic transparency improve knowledge learning performance, perceived social transparency and perceived diagnostic transparency promote continuous usage intention and cognitive effort enhances knowledge learning performance but weakens continuous usage intention. Originality/value This study contributes to the literature by concretizing coping theory in the chatbot context and dissecting interaction transparency into three nuanced aspects from a more detailed perspective. It addresses the ongoing debate over whether chatbots will replace search engines. It further introduces two innovative types of chatbots and presents a comprehensive framework to reveal the underlying mechanism.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Internet Research
Published
2025-05-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/intr-10-2023-0853
Citations
1
Primary Topic
AI in Service Interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.48
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Search engine versus affective thought-guided chatbot for knowledge acquisition: the mediating roles of perceived social, expressive and diagnostic transparency and cognitive effort

Xiao‐Yue You, Shanshan Shang, Tianyun Yi
1 citations
Internet Research
AI in Service Interactions
2.48
article

Search engine versus affective thought-guided chatbot for knowledge acquisition: the mediating roles of perceived social, expressive and diagnostic transparency and cognitive effort

Xiao‐Yue You, Shanshan Shang, Tianyun Yi
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to investigate the effects of different types of chatbots on knowledge learning performance and continuous usage intention by designing thought-guided and affective thought-guided chatbots. Drawing on coping theory, the study further seeks to uncover the underlying mechanism, focusing on perceptions of three nuanced aspects of transparency—social, expressive and diagnostic—and cognitive effort in human–artificial intelligence interactions. Design/methodology/approach Two experiments were conducted to investigate the impacts. A within-subjects experiment compared search engines and popular simple chatbots. A between-subjects experiment added thought-guided and affective thought-guided chatbots. Analysis of variance and partial least squares structural equation modeling were employed to analyze the differences and relationships. Findings Results indicate that, despite users’ initial preference for selecting chatbots, there are no differences in terms of knowledge learning performance and continuous usage intention between the search engine and the simple chatbot. Among the four tools for knowledge acquisition, the affective thought-guided chatbot achieves the best knowledge learning performance, and the thought-guided chatbot shows the lowest continuous usage intention. The mechanism test reveals that, compared to the search engine, the affective thought-guided chatbot increases users’ perceptions of all three aspects of transparency and cognitive effort. Whereas the thought-guided chatbot only increases perceived expressive transparency and cognitive effort. Furthermore, perceived expressive transparency and perceived diagnostic transparency improve knowledge learning performance, perceived social transparency and perceived diagnostic transparency promote continuous usage intention and cognitive effort enhances knowledge learning performance but weakens continuous usage intention. Originality/value This study contributes to the literature by concretizing coping theory in the chatbot context and dissecting interaction transparency into three nuanced aspects from a more detailed perspective. It addresses the ongoing debate over whether chatbots will replace search engines. It further introduces two innovative types of chatbots and presents a comprehensive framework to reveal the underlying mechanism.

Internet Research
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
AI in Service Interactions
2.48
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.