Conceptualizing Latinx vis-à-vis Race in Education Research

Many U.S. education researchers studying racism and minoritized groups, including Latinxs, face the question of how to conceptualize Latinx vis-à-vis race. This question is important to the education field because schools—and education research—contribute to our society’s understanding of race and the formation of racialized groups. The author argues that not conceptualizing Latinx as a U.S.-based racial category obscures the racialization process in three ways. First, it simplifies the concept of race as constructed only on visual characteristics. Second, it misses the opportunity to connect the critiques of the category’s essentialism and exclusion as a symptom of racialization’s nefarious process and purpose. Third, it ignores that racialization is context-based. The conclusion suggests future directions for education research, theory, and practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Educational Researcher
Published
2025-05-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189x251336178
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Critical Race Theory in Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.40
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Conceptualizing Latinx vis-à-vis Race in Education Research

Laura C. Chávez-Moreno
2 citations
Educational Researcher
Critical Race Theory in Education
8.40
article

Conceptualizing Latinx vis-à-vis Race in Education Research

Laura C. Chávez-Moreno
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Many U.S. education researchers studying racism and minoritized groups, including Latinxs, face the question of how to conceptualize Latinx vis-à-vis race. This question is important to the education field because schools—and education research—contribute to our society’s understanding of race and the formation of racialized groups. The author argues that not conceptualizing Latinx as a U.S.-based racial category obscures the racialization process in three ways. First, it simplifies the concept of race as constructed only on visual characteristics. Second, it misses the opportunity to connect the critiques of the category’s essentialism and exclusion as a symptom of racialization’s nefarious process and purpose. Third, it ignores that racialization is context-based. The conclusion suggests future directions for education research, theory, and practice.

Educational ResearcherVol. 54(7)
University of California, Los Angeles (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Critical Race Theory in Education
8.40
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.