Assessment of Potential Environmental Impact: Synthetic and Natural Binders

Binders play a critical role in the construction industry, especially when combined with plant-based granulates and fibers. The binder is selected based on its physical and chemical characteristics for compatibility with certain construction requirements. New market trends highlight the use of green binders that meet global sustainability targets, demonstrating a move toward greener building and environmental sustainability. This study presents a cradle-to-gate comparative life cycle assessment (LCA) of synthetic binders – namely Polyvinyl Acetate (PVA) and Carboxymethyl Cellulose (CMC) and agriculture starch-based binders made from cassava, wheat, and corn. The Life Cycle Assessment was conducted using SimaPro software based on ISO 14040/14044 standards using the ReCiPe Midpoint and CML IA Baseline. The assessment is cradle-to-gate with a function unit of 1 kg for binder production. Key environmental sustainability metrics such as Global Warming Potential (GWP) and Acidification Potential (AP) are assessed to rank the binder sustainability relative to each other. The results show that synthetic binder PVA has the highest environmental impact in almost all impact categories, especially GWP (6.55 kg CO2 eq in ReCiPe and 6.37 kg CO2 eq in CML) and AP (0.012 kg SO2 eq in ReCiPe and 0.015 kg SO2 eq in CML). Among natural binders, Corn Starch shows the lowest environmental impact with GWP values of 0.930 kg CO2 eq (ReCiPe) and 0.896 kg CO2 eq (CML) and AP values of 0.010 kg SO2 eq (ReCiPe) and 0.016 kg SO2 eq (CML). The agricultural binders (Cassava Starch, Wheat Starch, and Corn Starch) are environmentally friendlier than the synthetic binders (PVA and CMC). Although agricultural binders carry environmental costs associated with farming operations, they have lower environmental impacts than synthetic alternatives, demonstrating their sustainability potential in binder applications.