The Relationship Between Managers’ Leadership Styles and Registered Nurses’ Job Satisfaction and Work Engagement: A Cross‐Sectional Study in the United Arab Emirates

Background: Supportive leadership styles in nurse managers boost nurses’ satisfaction, commitment, and retention, reducing burnout and enhancing productivity. In contrast, ineffective leadership styles lower job satisfaction and engagement, leading to poor performance. This study aims to assess the relationship between nurse managers’ leadership styles and registered nurses’ job satisfaction and work engagement. Methods: A cross‐sectional study was deployed. Two hundred and forty‐one participants were recruited using convenient sampling. Data were gathered through a demographic questionnaire, the Minnesota Satisfaction Questionnaire (MSQ), the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale (UWES), and the Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire (MLQ‐5X). Results: Common leadership styles among nurses included management by exception (passive) (2.39 ± 0.97), laissez‐faire (2.30 ± 1.07), and idealized attributes (2.04 ± 1.03). Job satisfaction was medium in intrinsic, extrinsic, and general satisfaction, while very low and low patterns were common in the total score and domains of vigor, absorption, and dedication of work engagement. Compared with males, females reported a higher general satisfaction score (3.46 ± 1.00 vs. 2.61 ± 1.08, p < 0.001) and a higher total work engagement score (3.57 ± 1.74 vs. 2.28 ± 1.63, p < 0.001). Leadership styles significantly correlated with job satisfaction and work engagement, with the highest correlation between inspirational motivation and intrinsic satisfaction ( r = 0.665, p ≤ 0.01) and between inspirational motivation and vigor domain ( r = 0.775, p ≤ 0.01). Furthermore, leadership styles functioned as a predictor of general satisfaction ( R 2 = 0.508) and total score of work engagement ( R 2 = 0.543). Conclusion: This study highlights the complex interplay between leadership styles, job satisfaction, and work engagement among registered nurses. Policymakers and healthcare leaders should use the study results to implement policies that consider the negative and positive effects of leadership styles in enhancing job satisfaction and work engagement. They should prioritize training and specialized courses for the currently hired nurse managers.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Nursing Forum
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1155/nuf/3157747
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.76
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Relationship Between Managers’ Leadership Styles and Registered Nurses’ Job Satisfaction and Work Engagement: A Cross‐Sectional Study in the United Arab Emirates

Ahmad M. Al-Bashaireh, Omar Khraisat, Yousef Aljawarneh, Khawla Alblooshi et al.
1 citations
Nursing Forum
Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
2.76
article

The Relationship Between Managers’ Leadership Styles and Registered Nurses’ Job Satisfaction and Work Engagement: A Cross‐Sectional Study in the United Arab Emirates

Ahmad M. Al-Bashaireh, Omar Khraisat, Yousef Aljawarneh, Khawla Alblooshi, Marwa Almesmari, Marwah Alsaadi, Moza Alqaydi, Shaikha Aldhanhani, Amani F. Alshamari
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Background: Supportive leadership styles in nurse managers boost nurses’ satisfaction, commitment, and retention, reducing burnout and enhancing productivity. In contrast, ineffective leadership styles lower job satisfaction and engagement, leading to poor performance. This study aims to assess the relationship between nurse managers’ leadership styles and registered nurses’ job satisfaction and work engagement. Methods: A cross‐sectional study was deployed. Two hundred and forty‐one participants were recruited using convenient sampling. Data were gathered through a demographic questionnaire, the Minnesota Satisfaction Questionnaire (MSQ), the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale (UWES), and the Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire (MLQ‐5X). Results: Common leadership styles among nurses included management by exception (passive) (2.39 ± 0.97), laissez‐faire (2.30 ± 1.07), and idealized attributes (2.04 ± 1.03). Job satisfaction was medium in intrinsic, extrinsic, and general satisfaction, while very low and low patterns were common in the total score and domains of vigor, absorption, and dedication of work engagement. Compared with males, females reported a higher general satisfaction score (3.46 ± 1.00 vs. 2.61 ± 1.08, p < 0.001) and a higher total work engagement score (3.57 ± 1.74 vs. 2.28 ± 1.63, p < 0.001). Leadership styles significantly correlated with job satisfaction and work engagement, with the highest correlation between inspirational motivation and intrinsic satisfaction ( r = 0.665, p ≤ 0.01) and between inspirational motivation and vigor domain ( r = 0.775, p ≤ 0.01). Furthermore, leadership styles functioned as a predictor of general satisfaction ( R 2 = 0.508) and total score of work engagement ( R 2 = 0.543). Conclusion: This study highlights the complex interplay between leadership styles, job satisfaction, and work engagement among registered nurses. Policymakers and healthcare leaders should use the study results to implement policies that consider the negative and positive effects of leadership styles in enhancing job satisfaction and work engagement. They should prioritize training and specialized courses for the currently hired nurse managers.

Nursing ForumVol. 2025(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
2.76
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.