Identifying Latent Profiles of Healthy Adults’ Biopsychosocial Pain Concepts

<b>Objectives:</b> To develop effective, individualized pain science education for people with chronic (primary) pain, underlying pain concepts, defined as the understanding of what pain is, what function it serves, and what processes are thought to underpin it, are essential. Pain concepts and misconcepts of chronic pain can influence its development and maintenance. This study explores whether profiles of healthy adults' biopsychosocial pain concepts can be identified using a newly developed tool, the <i>biopsychosocial pain concept matrix</i> (BiPS matrix), and if adults assigned to the profiles differ regarding sociodemographic and pain-related variables. <b>Methods:</b> <i>N</i> = 229 healthy adults (75% female, <i>M</i> = 22.66 years, SD = 3.61) participated in an online survey. The BiPS matrix assesses biopsychosocial pain concepts through 40 items on the biological, psychological, and social domains combined with the five content dimensions of the common-sense model of self-regulation. <b>Results:</b> A latent profile analysis (LPA) revealed a five-profile solution with distinct patterns of biopsychosocial pain concepts. Participants assigned to Profile 1 demonstrated strongly developed biopsychosocial pain concepts, Profile 2 showed weakly developed concepts, and Profiles 3 to 5 showed different levels of pain concepts. General and neurophysiological pain knowledge differed between profiles, with higher scores being associated with Profile 1 and lower scores with Profile 5. There were no differences in sociodemographic variables in adults assigned to the different profiles. <b>Discussion:</b> Results provide preliminary evidence for distinct profiles of biopsychosocial pain concepts among healthy adults. Further research should replicate these findings in clinical samples to better understand biopsychosocial pain concepts and their use for individualized pain science education.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Pain Research and Management
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1155/prm/5706849
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.39
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Identifying Latent Profiles of Healthy Adults’ Biopsychosocial Pain Concepts

Tanja Hechler, Linda Wickering, Michael Schneider, Catherina Lenhof et al.
1 citations
Pain Research and Management
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
1.39
article

Identifying Latent Profiles of Healthy Adults’ Biopsychosocial Pain Concepts

Tanja Hechler, Linda Wickering, Michael Schneider, Catherina Lenhof, Laura Dukek, Lena Hitschler
article en
1 citations

Abstract

<b>Objectives:</b> To develop effective, individualized pain science education for people with chronic (primary) pain, underlying pain concepts, defined as the understanding of what pain is, what function it serves, and what processes are thought to underpin it, are essential. Pain concepts and misconcepts of chronic pain can influence its development and maintenance. This study explores whether profiles of healthy adults' biopsychosocial pain concepts can be identified using a newly developed tool, the <i>biopsychosocial pain concept matrix</i> (BiPS matrix), and if adults assigned to the profiles differ regarding sociodemographic and pain-related variables. <b>Methods:</b> <i>N</i> = 229 healthy adults (75% female, <i>M</i> = 22.66 years, SD = 3.61) participated in an online survey. The BiPS matrix assesses biopsychosocial pain concepts through 40 items on the biological, psychological, and social domains combined with the five content dimensions of the common-sense model of self-regulation. <b>Results:</b> A latent profile analysis (LPA) revealed a five-profile solution with distinct patterns of biopsychosocial pain concepts. Participants assigned to Profile 1 demonstrated strongly developed biopsychosocial pain concepts, Profile 2 showed weakly developed concepts, and Profiles 3 to 5 showed different levels of pain concepts. General and neurophysiological pain knowledge differed between profiles, with higher scores being associated with Profile 1 and lower scores with Profile 5. There were no differences in sociodemographic variables in adults assigned to the different profiles. <b>Discussion:</b> Results provide preliminary evidence for distinct profiles of biopsychosocial pain concepts among healthy adults. Further research should replicate these findings in clinical samples to better understand biopsychosocial pain concepts and their use for individualized pain science education.

Pain Research and ManagementVol. 2025(1)
Trier University of Applied Sciences (DE), University of Münster (DE), RWTH Aachen University (DE), Universität Trier (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
1.39
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.