Exploring socio-technical imaginaries on smart city sustainability

Purpose The purpose of this study is to explore how the sociotechnical imaginaries of smart city sustainability converge and diverge between creators and users. Design/methodology/approach The authors built a theoretical framework using the lens of socio-technical imaginaries to demonstrate how creators and users perceive smart city sustainability based on the European Smart Cities Framework. They then conducted photo-elicitation interviews with 40 city creators and users based on visual sources created by the researchers. These photographs were used to expand ideas about sociotechnical imaginaries and explore imaginary aspects of smart city sustainability. Findings The socio-technical imaginaries of the three pillars of sustainability manifested by city creators did not always align with those of city users. While both actors generally have similar imaginaries on environmental issues, their imaginaries diverged on social and economic issues. Research limitations/implications Our findings highlight the complexity of competing sociotechnological imaginaries. The discrepancies between city creators and users in visualizing smart city sustainability underscore the fundamental tension between policy-driven strategies and life experiences. Practical implications This study provides insights for policymakers, practitioners and scholars seeking to foster a human-centric view of smart-city sustainability. Such an approach can also help meet the needs of multiple actors and promote building smart city projects based on a shared image of the sustainability of smart solutions. Social implications Imaginaries are necessary resources for transformation toward a sustainable future. The findings of this study reinforce the necessity for a more inclusive and participatory approach to smart city projects, leading to a sustainable future. However, to materialize this sustainable transformation, a participatory process is needed. Specifically, socio-technical imaginaries of smart city sustainability can be discussed and shared by creators and users with the hope that a transformative future will emerge. Originality/value This study contributes to the growing literature on smart city sustainability by revealing the diverging socio-technical imaginaries of city creators and users. Additionally, the authors provide methodological insights into data collection through photo-elicitation interviews.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sustainability Accounting Management and Policy Journal
Published
2025-05-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/sampj-05-2024-0534
Primary Topic
Smart Cities and Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring socio-technical imaginaries on smart city sustainability

Giuseppe Grossi, Dorota Dobija, Dominika Kaczmarek-Ciesielska, Zuzanna Staniszewska
Sustainability Accounting Management and Policy Journal
Smart Cities and Technologies
article

Exploring socio-technical imaginaries on smart city sustainability

Giuseppe Grossi, Dorota Dobija, Dominika Kaczmarek-Ciesielska, Zuzanna Staniszewska
article en

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this study is to explore how the sociotechnical imaginaries of smart city sustainability converge and diverge between creators and users. Design/methodology/approach The authors built a theoretical framework using the lens of socio-technical imaginaries to demonstrate how creators and users perceive smart city sustainability based on the European Smart Cities Framework. They then conducted photo-elicitation interviews with 40 city creators and users based on visual sources created by the researchers. These photographs were used to expand ideas about sociotechnical imaginaries and explore imaginary aspects of smart city sustainability. Findings The socio-technical imaginaries of the three pillars of sustainability manifested by city creators did not always align with those of city users. While both actors generally have similar imaginaries on environmental issues, their imaginaries diverged on social and economic issues. Research limitations/implications Our findings highlight the complexity of competing sociotechnological imaginaries. The discrepancies between city creators and users in visualizing smart city sustainability underscore the fundamental tension between policy-driven strategies and life experiences. Practical implications This study provides insights for policymakers, practitioners and scholars seeking to foster a human-centric view of smart-city sustainability. Such an approach can also help meet the needs of multiple actors and promote building smart city projects based on a shared image of the sustainability of smart solutions. Social implications Imaginaries are necessary resources for transformation toward a sustainable future. The findings of this study reinforce the necessity for a more inclusive and participatory approach to smart city projects, leading to a sustainable future. However, to materialize this sustainable transformation, a participatory process is needed. Specifically, socio-technical imaginaries of smart city sustainability can be discussed and shared by creators and users with the hope that a transformative future will emerge. Originality/value This study contributes to the growing literature on smart city sustainability by revealing the diverging socio-technical imaginaries of city creators and users. Additionally, the authors provide methodological insights into data collection through photo-elicitation interviews.

Sustainability Accounting Management and Policy JournalVol. 16(7)
Kozminski University (PL), Kristianstad University (SE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 86%
Smart Cities and Technologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.