COMPARATIVE STUDY OF UROKINASE VS TRISODIUM CITRATE IN PREVENTION OF LUMINAL THROMBOSIS IN TUNNELED DIALYSIS CATHETERS

Background: Tunneled dialysis catheters (TDCs) are vital for vascular access in hemodialysis patients but are frequently complicated by luminal thrombosis, leading to catheter dysfunction, reduced dialysis efficiency, and increased morbidity. Effective catheter lock solutions are essential to prevent thrombotic events and maintain long-term catheter patency. While urokinase is widely used for its thrombolytic properties, trisodium citrate has gained attention due to its anticoagulant action and potentially superior safety profile. Objective: To compare the efficacy and safety of trisodium citrate and urokinase in preventing luminal thrombosis in tunneled dialysis catheters. Methods: This nonrandomized controlled trial was conducted over 12 months at a tertiary care center. A total of 120 adult hemodialysis patients requiring tunneled dialysis catheter use were enrolled and assigned equally into two groups: Group 1 (n=60) received urokinase 5000 IU, and Group 2 (n=60) received trisodium citrate 4% as lock solutions following each dialysis session. The primary outcome was incidence of luminal thrombosis, clinically suspected and confirmed by ultrasound. Secondary outcomes included catheter survival time without thrombosis, catheter-related infections, mechanical complications, and adverse events. Data analysis was performed using SPSS version 23. Chi-square test and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis were employed where appropriate. Results: Trisodium citrate group exhibited a significantly lower thrombosis rate of 15% compared to 28% in the urokinase group (p=0.03). Median time to first thrombosis was 9 months in the citrate group versus 6 months in the urokinase group (p=0.02). Catheter survival without thrombosis was higher in the citrate group (85%) than urokinase (72%) (p=0.04). No significant differences were observed in infection (p=0.68) or mechanical complication rates (p=0.99). Local irritation occurred equally in 3.3% of patients in both groups. Conclusion: Trisodium citrate is more effective than urokinase in preventing luminal thrombosis in TDCs and supports better catheter survival with a comparable safety profile, making it a practical option for routine clinical use.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Insights-Journal of Health and Rehabilitation
Published
2025-05-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.71000/0vnmgy51
Primary Topic
Advanced Glycation End Products research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

COMPARATIVE STUDY OF UROKINASE VS TRISODIUM CITRATE IN PREVENTION OF LUMINAL THROMBOSIS IN TUNNELED DIALYSIS CATHETERS

Malik Nadeem Azam, Khurram Mansoor, Umer Khan, Sohail Sabir et al.
Insights-Journal of Health and Rehabilitation
Advanced Glycation End Products research
article

COMPARATIVE STUDY OF UROKINASE VS TRISODIUM CITRATE IN PREVENTION OF LUMINAL THROMBOSIS IN TUNNELED DIALYSIS CATHETERS

Malik Nadeem Azam, Khurram Mansoor, Umer Khan, Sohail Sabir, Naveed Sarwar, Farrukh Islam
article en

Abstract

Background: Tunneled dialysis catheters (TDCs) are vital for vascular access in hemodialysis patients but are frequently complicated by luminal thrombosis, leading to catheter dysfunction, reduced dialysis efficiency, and increased morbidity. Effective catheter lock solutions are essential to prevent thrombotic events and maintain long-term catheter patency. While urokinase is widely used for its thrombolytic properties, trisodium citrate has gained attention due to its anticoagulant action and potentially superior safety profile. Objective: To compare the efficacy and safety of trisodium citrate and urokinase in preventing luminal thrombosis in tunneled dialysis catheters. Methods: This nonrandomized controlled trial was conducted over 12 months at a tertiary care center. A total of 120 adult hemodialysis patients requiring tunneled dialysis catheter use were enrolled and assigned equally into two groups: Group 1 (n=60) received urokinase 5000 IU, and Group 2 (n=60) received trisodium citrate 4% as lock solutions following each dialysis session. The primary outcome was incidence of luminal thrombosis, clinically suspected and confirmed by ultrasound. Secondary outcomes included catheter survival time without thrombosis, catheter-related infections, mechanical complications, and adverse events. Data analysis was performed using SPSS version 23. Chi-square test and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis were employed where appropriate. Results: Trisodium citrate group exhibited a significantly lower thrombosis rate of 15% compared to 28% in the urokinase group (p=0.03). Median time to first thrombosis was 9 months in the citrate group versus 6 months in the urokinase group (p=0.02). Catheter survival without thrombosis was higher in the citrate group (85%) than urokinase (72%) (p=0.04). No significant differences were observed in infection (p=0.68) or mechanical complication rates (p=0.99). Local irritation occurred equally in 3.3% of patients in both groups. Conclusion: Trisodium citrate is more effective than urokinase in preventing luminal thrombosis in TDCs and supports better catheter survival with a comparable safety profile, making it a practical option for routine clinical use.

Insights-Journal of Health and RehabilitationVol. 3(3 (Health & Allied))
Openalex Percentile: Top 88%
Advanced Glycation End Products research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.