Comparison of the Effectiveness of Reality Therapy and Acceptance and Commitment Therapy on Academic Procrastination in Female Students with Symptoms of Nomophobia

The present study aimed to compare the effectiveness of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) and Reality Therapy on academic procrastination in female high school students with symptoms of nomophobia. This research is classified as fundamental research and employs a quasi-experimental design with a pre-test, post-test, and follow-up, along with a control group. The statistical population consisted of all female high school students in the second cycle of secondary education in District 3 of Tehran during the 2023–2024 academic year. The sampling method was convenience sampling, and a total of 45 participants were selected. Data were collected using the Nomophobia Questionnaire by Yildirim and Correia (2015) and the Academic Procrastination Questionnaire by Solomon and Rothblum (1984). The protocol for the group therapy sessions based on ACT (Hayes et al., 1999) was adapted from Khatibi et al. (2020) and implemented over eight sessions, while the intervention protocol based on Reality Therapy was adapted from Eskandari (2017) and also conducted over eight sessions. Data analysis was performed using repeated measures analysis of variance. The results indicated a significant difference in the effectiveness of ACT and Reality Therapy on academic procrastination in female high school students with symptoms of nomophobia, with Reality Therapy leading to a greater reduction in academic procrastination compared to ACT.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
KMAN Counseling and Psychology Nexus
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.61838/kman.cp.psynexus.3.7
Primary Topic
Perfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of the Effectiveness of Reality Therapy and Acceptance and Commitment Therapy on Academic Procrastination in Female Students with Symptoms of Nomophobia

Reza Khakpour, Simindokht Rezakhani, Mansoureh Sadat Ghoreishi
KMAN Counseling and Psychology Nexus
Perfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety Studies
article

Comparison of the Effectiveness of Reality Therapy and Acceptance and Commitment Therapy on Academic Procrastination in Female Students with Symptoms of Nomophobia

Reza Khakpour, Simindokht Rezakhani, Mansoureh Sadat Ghoreishi
article en

Abstract

The present study aimed to compare the effectiveness of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) and Reality Therapy on academic procrastination in female high school students with symptoms of nomophobia. This research is classified as fundamental research and employs a quasi-experimental design with a pre-test, post-test, and follow-up, along with a control group. The statistical population consisted of all female high school students in the second cycle of secondary education in District 3 of Tehran during the 2023–2024 academic year. The sampling method was convenience sampling, and a total of 45 participants were selected. Data were collected using the Nomophobia Questionnaire by Yildirim and Correia (2015) and the Academic Procrastination Questionnaire by Solomon and Rothblum (1984). The protocol for the group therapy sessions based on ACT (Hayes et al., 1999) was adapted from Khatibi et al. (2020) and implemented over eight sessions, while the intervention protocol based on Reality Therapy was adapted from Eskandari (2017) and also conducted over eight sessions. Data analysis was performed using repeated measures analysis of variance. The results indicated a significant difference in the effectiveness of ACT and Reality Therapy on academic procrastination in female high school students with symptoms of nomophobia, with Reality Therapy leading to a greater reduction in academic procrastination compared to ACT.

KMAN Counseling and Psychology NexusVol. 3
Openalex Percentile: Top 86%
Perfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.