Rethinking Money and Budget Lines: A Comparative Study of Secular and Islamic Economic Rationality

This study addresses the fundamental differences between secular and Islamic economic concepts of money and its usage, highlighting a research gap in understanding these paradigms. The objective is to analyze the concept of money from both perspectives and link it to rational Islamic solutions for achieving optimal welfare. Employing a qualitative methodology through library research, the study illustrates the application of these concepts with case examples. Findings reveal that in secular economics, money is viewed as a commodity that serves as a store of wealth and capital. In contrast, in Islamic economics, money is regarded as a public good that should facilitate productive transactions under Sharia principles. The research concludes that rationality in Islamic economics emphasizes not only utility maximization but also the maximization of social welfare, where optimal consumption occurs when the Sharia-compliant budget line intersects with the highest iso-maslahah curve. This study contributes to a deeper understanding of the differences in economic paradigms and their implications for Islamic financial policy, asserting that the Islamic economic system offers solutions based on values of blessing and social welfare. The findings encourage further exploration of the practical application of Sharia budget lines in contemporary economic decision-making.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Jurnal Ilmu Ekonomi dan Bisnis Islam
Published
2024-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.24239/jiebi.v6i2.363.190-210
Primary Topic
Islamic Finance and Banking Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Rethinking Money and Budget Lines: A Comparative Study of Secular and Islamic Economic Rationality

Luluk Latifah, Salameh alkhazaleh
Jurnal Ilmu Ekonomi dan Bisnis Islam
Islamic Finance and Banking Studies
article

Rethinking Money and Budget Lines: A Comparative Study of Secular and Islamic Economic Rationality

Luluk Latifah, Salameh alkhazaleh
article en

Abstract

This study addresses the fundamental differences between secular and Islamic economic concepts of money and its usage, highlighting a research gap in understanding these paradigms. The objective is to analyze the concept of money from both perspectives and link it to rational Islamic solutions for achieving optimal welfare. Employing a qualitative methodology through library research, the study illustrates the application of these concepts with case examples. Findings reveal that in secular economics, money is viewed as a commodity that serves as a store of wealth and capital. In contrast, in Islamic economics, money is regarded as a public good that should facilitate productive transactions under Sharia principles. The research concludes that rationality in Islamic economics emphasizes not only utility maximization but also the maximization of social welfare, where optimal consumption occurs when the Sharia-compliant budget line intersects with the highest iso-maslahah curve. This study contributes to a deeper understanding of the differences in economic paradigms and their implications for Islamic financial policy, asserting that the Islamic economic system offers solutions based on values of blessing and social welfare. The findings encourage further exploration of the practical application of Sharia budget lines in contemporary economic decision-making.

Jurnal Ilmu Ekonomi dan Bisnis IslamVol. 6(2)
University of Malaya (MY), Universitas Muhammadiyah Surabaya (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 50%
Islamic Finance and Banking Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.