A comparative techno-economic study of the Net-Metering and Net-Billing self-consumption schemes for industrial and residential consumers in Greece
This paper presents a comparative techno-economic study of the net-metering and net-billing self-consumption schemes when applied to industrial and residential consumers that are equipped with a PV system in their premises. Fixed-tilt and single-axis tracking PV mounting systems have been considered, whereas the multiple cost components of the supply and regulated charges have been explicitly modeled and analyzed. Real-life electricity consumption and PV generation data have been used along with detailed wholesale electricity market data derived by an analytical long-term chronological simulation of the Greek wholesale electricity market under hourly time granularity for a 20-year study period (2026-2045) using a specialized integrated market simulation software. Simulation results show that the installation of an on-site PV system can lead to notable annual electricity cost savings for both consumer types and self-consumption schemes. The co-evaluation of the annual cost savings with the project investment and operational costs in the long-term provides further insights into the impact that the adopted self-consumption scheme along with the selected PV mounting system and the capital expenditure may have on standard project valuation indicators for each consumer type.
Authors
- Pandelis N. Biskas (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9058-2144)
- Christos K. Simoglou (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2363-0094)
- Stylianos I. Vagropoulos (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6861-5656)
Institutions
- University of Thessaly (GR)
- International Hellenic University (GR)
- Aristotle University of Thessaloniki (GR)
- University Hospital of Larissa (GR)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Sustainable Energy Grids and Networks
- Published
- 2025-05-10
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.segan.2025.101726
- Citations
- 5
- Primary Topic
- Smart Grid Energy Management
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 3.65