Biomarker profiling for infection diagnosis in emergency departments: A diagnostic study evaluating C-reactive protein, procalcitonin, Club Cell Protein 16, interleukin-6, chitinase-like protein, and soluble urokinase-type plasminogen activator recep

CRP, IL-6, and PCT showed the best diagnostic accuracy among the biomarkers tested but are influenced by the timing of symptom onset and fever presence. CC16, suPAR, and YKL-40 had poor diagnostic accuracy and were considered poor discriminators. Overall, no single biomarker was sufficient to conclusively rule in or rule out infection. These findings support the need for nuanced interpretation when using biomarkers to diagnose infections in ED settings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical Biochemistry
Published
2025-05-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2025.110943
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Respiratory viral infections research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.35

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Biomarker profiling for infection diagnosis in emergency departments: A diagnostic study evaluating C-reactive protein, procalcitonin, Club Cell Protein 16, interleukin-6, chitinase-like protein, and soluble urokinase-type plasminogen activator recep

Anne Heltborg, Christian Backer Mogensen, Helene Skjøt‐Arkil, Thor Aage Skovsted et al.
1 citations
Clinical Biochemistry
Respiratory viral infections research
1.35
article

Biomarker profiling for infection diagnosis in emergency departments: A diagnostic study evaluating C-reactive protein, procalcitonin, Club Cell Protein 16, interleukin-6, chitinase-like protein, and soluble urokinase-type plasminogen activator recep

Anne Heltborg, Christian Backer Mogensen, Helene Skjøt‐Arkil, Thor Aage Skovsted, Claus Lohman Brasen, Mariana Bichuette Cartuliares, Roberta Bruhn, Eva Rabing Brix Petersen, Eline Sandvig Andersen, Antoní Torres, Marshall I. Hertz
article en
1 citations

Abstract

CRP, IL-6, and PCT showed the best diagnostic accuracy among the biomarkers tested but are influenced by the timing of symptom onset and fever presence. CC16, suPAR, and YKL-40 had poor diagnostic accuracy and were considered poor discriminators. Overall, no single biomarker was sufficient to conclusively rule in or rule out infection. These findings support the need for nuanced interpretation when using biomarkers to diagnose infections in ED settings.

Clinical BiochemistryVol. 138
University of Southern Denmark (DK), Odense University Hospital (DK), Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Respiratorias (ES), Region of Southern Denmark (DK)
Syddansk Universitet
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Respiratory viral infections research
1.35
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Biomarker profiling for infection diagnosis in emergency departments: A diagnostic study evaluating C-reactive protein, procalcitonin, Club Cell Protein 16, interleukin-6, chitinase-like protein, and soluble urokinase-type plasminogen activator recep — Anne Heltborg, Christian Backer Mogensen, et al. · Clinical Biochemistry (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS