Transplanting tef boosts yield, nutrient, and water use efficiencies under optimal nitrogen uses in semiarid areas

Tef ( Eragrostis tef ) in Ethiopia has low nutrient use efficiency, with transplanting potentially improving nitrogen use, water efficiency, and yield compared to conventional broadcasting. This study evaluates the combined effects of different planting methods and nitrogen fertilizer levels on the yield, nutrient, and water use efficiency of irrigated tef crops. Four planting methods (broadcasting, row planting, pelleting, and transplanting) were tested alongside five nitrogen levels (0, 46, 92, 138, and 184 kg/ha) over two consecutive years. Analysis of variance revealed significant effects of planting methods, nitrogen levels, and their interactions on key variables, including lodging index, biomass yield, grain yield, nutrient use efficiency, water use efficiency, and economic water productivity (p < 0.05). Transplanted tef demonstrated remarkable improvements: a 650% reduction in lodging index, a 94% increase in shoot biomass, an 80% increase in grain yield, and a 78% improvement in agronomic use efficiency compared to broadcasting. Additionally, transplanting maintained low lodging levels even with higher nitrogen applications, unlike other methods where lodging increased with increased nitrogen levels, and reduced yields. Transplanted tef with 92 kg/ha of nitrogen showed the highest nitrogen use efficiency and economic returns, offering the greatest yield benefits per unit of nitrogen applied. These results suggest that transplanting, combined with optimized nitrogen levels, significantly enhances productivity, water use efficiency, and economic returns while reducing environmental impacts. This approach offers practical solutions for improving tef farming practices, particularly in regions with similar agroecological conditions. • Transplanting methods effectively reduce lodging in tef and enhance yield and yield traits. • Increased nitrogen levels under transplanting methods do not affect lodging but improve shoot biomass and grain yield with increased N application. • Using transplanting with 92 kg/ha of nitrogen enhances N and water use efficiencies and overall water productivity in semiarid regions. • Investing in transplanting methods yields better returns than broadcasting methods, regardless of nitrogen application. • Adopting transplanting with 92 kg/ha of N boosts yield, nutrient and, water use efficiency, and economic benefits in tef cultivation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Agriculture and Food Research
Published
2025-05-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafr.2025.102009
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Irrigation Practices and Water Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.93
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Transplanting tef boosts yield, nutrient, and water use efficiencies under optimal nitrogen uses in semiarid areas

Emiru Birhane, Zerihun Tadele, Kidu Gebremeskel, Solomon Habtu et al.
5 citations
Journal of Agriculture and Food Research
Irrigation Practices and Water Management
5.93
article

Transplanting tef boosts yield, nutrient, and water use efficiencies under optimal nitrogen uses in semiarid areas

Emiru Birhane, Zerihun Tadele, Kidu Gebremeskel, Solomon Habtu, Mitiku Haile, Solomon Chanyalew, Kbebew Assefa
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Tef ( Eragrostis tef ) in Ethiopia has low nutrient use efficiency, with transplanting potentially improving nitrogen use, water efficiency, and yield compared to conventional broadcasting. This study evaluates the combined effects of different planting methods and nitrogen fertilizer levels on the yield, nutrient, and water use efficiency of irrigated tef crops. Four planting methods (broadcasting, row planting, pelleting, and transplanting) were tested alongside five nitrogen levels (0, 46, 92, 138, and 184 kg/ha) over two consecutive years. Analysis of variance revealed significant effects of planting methods, nitrogen levels, and their interactions on key variables, including lodging index, biomass yield, grain yield, nutrient use efficiency, water use efficiency, and economic water productivity (p < 0.05). Transplanted tef demonstrated remarkable improvements: a 650% reduction in lodging index, a 94% increase in shoot biomass, an 80% increase in grain yield, and a 78% improvement in agronomic use efficiency compared to broadcasting. Additionally, transplanting maintained low lodging levels even with higher nitrogen applications, unlike other methods where lodging increased with increased nitrogen levels, and reduced yields. Transplanted tef with 92 kg/ha of nitrogen showed the highest nitrogen use efficiency and economic returns, offering the greatest yield benefits per unit of nitrogen applied. These results suggest that transplanting, combined with optimized nitrogen levels, significantly enhances productivity, water use efficiency, and economic returns while reducing environmental impacts. This approach offers practical solutions for improving tef farming practices, particularly in regions with similar agroecological conditions. • Transplanting methods effectively reduce lodging in tef and enhance yield and yield traits. • Increased nitrogen levels under transplanting methods do not affect lodging but improve shoot biomass and grain yield with increased N application. • Using transplanting with 92 kg/ha of nitrogen enhances N and water use efficiencies and overall water productivity in semiarid regions. • Investing in transplanting methods yields better returns than broadcasting methods, regardless of nitrogen application. • Adopting transplanting with 92 kg/ha of N boosts yield, nutrient and, water use efficiency, and economic benefits in tef cultivation.

Journal of Agriculture and Food ResearchVol. 21
University of Bern (CH), Nord University (NO), Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research (ET), Mekelle University (ET)
Clean water and sanitation
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Irrigation Practices and Water Management
5.93
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.