Ecological risk assessment of heavy metals in the marine sediments associated with the petroleum hydrocarbon industry in the central Arabian Gulf

• Levels of heavy metals in the surface sediments of the central Arabian Gulf were generally low, which suggests that lithogenic inputs are the main source mechanism, except for As. • Sediment characteristics and TOC content contributed to low metal concentrations together with hydrographical and geochemical conditions. • Harbors and offshore sites contained the highest levels of heavy metals, due to the relatively high percentage of clay and TOC, as well as limited anthropogenic source As. • Metal pollution associated with the hydrocarbon petroleum extraction industry was not detected. • An ecological risk assessment indicated no-to-low risk at surface marine sediments of Qatar. Heavy metal contamination of marine sediments poses a critical environmental threat in the Arabian Gulf, with documented impacts linked to regional activities of petroleum industry. Despite this, there is still very limited information and a big gap in the literature on contamination status of surface sediments. Therefore, this study aims to address this concern by examining the spatial distribution and levels of heavy metals and metalloids within the sediments of the Qatar’s Exclusive Economic Zone, focusing on the potential ecological risks and toxicological impacts, associated with the petroleum hydrocarbon industry. Sediment samples were collected from the central Arabian Gulf, repressing distinctive water depths at 12 stations, spanning depths of 11 to 72 meters. The multipurpose Qatar University research vessel (R/V Janan) was utilized for sampling. Samples were analyzed for metal concentrations, grain size, and total organic carbon content. Mean concentrations (mg kg⁻¹) were found in the following order: Ca (292,281) > Al (6,530) > Fe (4,623) > Sr (2,433) > Mn (83.3) > Ni (15.5) > Cr (22) > Zn (13.1) > V (8.7) > Cu (5.7) > As (4.02) > Co (2.17) > Pb (1.43) > Cd (0.04) > Hg (0.02), with Sb levels below detectable limits of the instrument (0.0013 mg kg -1 ). The results indicated that the four major metals (Al, Fe, Sr, and Mn) exhibited higher mean concentrations than the other elements. Ni, V, Pb, Cd, Hg and Sb had the lowest concentration. Ecological risk assessments revealed that, except for As, most metals presented limited pollution risk. This elevated Arsenic concentration was observed at deep-water stations and harbor areas along the southern transect. The relationships between elemental concentrations, sediment characteristics, and their TOC contents are both evident and well-defined. Grain size fractions of sediments and TOC content contributed to low metal concentrations together with the mechanism of prevailing hydrodynamic conditions. The strong statistical correlation between the natural background elements Al, Fe, and other heavy metals indicated natural origin. The study’s multiple-element risk index highlighted that anthropogenic activities associated with oil operations, and petroleum hydrocarbon extraction facilities have a minimal impact on marine sediment heavy metal concentrations. Overall, the results suggest a low-to-slight toxic pollution status in the study area. This study provides critical information for policymakers supporting efforts for sustainable marine management strategies in the Arabian Gulf’s vulnerable ecosystems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Hazardous Materials Advances
Published
2025-05-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hazadv.2025.100749
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Heavy metals in environment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.01

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Ecological risk assessment of heavy metals in the marine sediments associated with the petroleum hydrocarbon industry in the central Arabian Gulf

Yasir Elginaid Mohieldeen, Rifaat Abdalla, Elnaiem Ali Elobaid, Oğuz Yiğiterhan et al.
2 citations
Journal of Hazardous Materials Advances
Heavy metals in environment
1.01
article

Ecological risk assessment of heavy metals in the marine sediments associated with the petroleum hydrocarbon industry in the central Arabian Gulf

Yasir Elginaid Mohieldeen, Rifaat Abdalla, Elnaiem Ali Elobaid, Oğuz Yiğiterhan, Zhi Chen, Ebrahim M.A.S. Al-Ansari
article en
2 citations

Abstract

• Levels of heavy metals in the surface sediments of the central Arabian Gulf were generally low, which suggests that lithogenic inputs are the main source mechanism, except for As. • Sediment characteristics and TOC content contributed to low metal concentrations together with hydrographical and geochemical conditions. • Harbors and offshore sites contained the highest levels of heavy metals, due to the relatively high percentage of clay and TOC, as well as limited anthropogenic source As. • Metal pollution associated with the hydrocarbon petroleum extraction industry was not detected. • An ecological risk assessment indicated no-to-low risk at surface marine sediments of Qatar. Heavy metal contamination of marine sediments poses a critical environmental threat in the Arabian Gulf, with documented impacts linked to regional activities of petroleum industry. Despite this, there is still very limited information and a big gap in the literature on contamination status of surface sediments. Therefore, this study aims to address this concern by examining the spatial distribution and levels of heavy metals and metalloids within the sediments of the Qatar’s Exclusive Economic Zone, focusing on the potential ecological risks and toxicological impacts, associated with the petroleum hydrocarbon industry. Sediment samples were collected from the central Arabian Gulf, repressing distinctive water depths at 12 stations, spanning depths of 11 to 72 meters. The multipurpose Qatar University research vessel (R/V Janan) was utilized for sampling. Samples were analyzed for metal concentrations, grain size, and total organic carbon content. Mean concentrations (mg kg⁻¹) were found in the following order: Ca (292,281) > Al (6,530) > Fe (4,623) > Sr (2,433) > Mn (83.3) > Ni (15.5) > Cr (22) > Zn (13.1) > V (8.7) > Cu (5.7) > As (4.02) > Co (2.17) > Pb (1.43) > Cd (0.04) > Hg (0.02), with Sb levels below detectable limits of the instrument (0.0013 mg kg -1 ). The results indicated that the four major metals (Al, Fe, Sr, and Mn) exhibited higher mean concentrations than the other elements. Ni, V, Pb, Cd, Hg and Sb had the lowest concentration. Ecological risk assessments revealed that, except for As, most metals presented limited pollution risk. This elevated Arsenic concentration was observed at deep-water stations and harbor areas along the southern transect. The relationships between elemental concentrations, sediment characteristics, and their TOC contents are both evident and well-defined. Grain size fractions of sediments and TOC content contributed to low metal concentrations together with the mechanism of prevailing hydrodynamic conditions. The strong statistical correlation between the natural background elements Al, Fe, and other heavy metals indicated natural origin. The study’s multiple-element risk index highlighted that anthropogenic activities associated with oil operations, and petroleum hydrocarbon extraction facilities have a minimal impact on marine sediment heavy metal concentrations. Overall, the results suggest a low-to-slight toxic pollution status in the study area. This study provides critical information for policymakers supporting efforts for sustainable marine management strategies in the Arabian Gulf’s vulnerable ecosystems.

Journal of Hazardous Materials AdvancesVol. 19
Hamad bin Khalifa University (QA), Sultan Qaboos University (OM), Concordia University (CA), Qatar University (QA), Qatar Foundation (QA)
Qatar Foundation
Life below water
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Heavy metals in environment
1.01
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.