Towards Transparent Deep Learning: Assessing Model Accuracy and Interpretability in CNNs

In this work, various CNN architectures that include the baseline, width-scaled, as well as depth-scaled designs were measured and their performance based on top-(1, 3, 5) accuracy. The baseline reported 71.47% Top-1, 91.99% Top-3, and 97.33% Top-5 with 361,034 parameters. Using scaling, the width of the model increased up to 75.24% (Top-1), 93.40% (Top-3), and 97.63% (Top-5) with parameterization increased to 1,430,666. The depth-scaled model achieved the best accuracy in Top-(1,3,5) as 81.99%, 95.67%, and 98.70%, respectively; however, such a model imposes a whopping 24,492,234 parameters on the complexity level. Advanced visualization techniques like Integrated Grad-CAM and LIME have been used for a better understanding of model behaviour. The results depict the fact that deeper models capture more detailed information, but this also introduces noise. The width-scaled model shows a balance between accuracy and interpretability as applied. Further analysis will further unveil the hard trade-of between accuracy and interpretability across the different variants of CNNs. In baseline, width-scaled, and depth-scaled models, two properties were analysed. In this work, the baseline model utilized its simplest architecture as a reference point, then scaled the width and depth of each net to try to improve performance. Accuracy and interpretability have been investigated through visualization techniques: integrated gradients and LIME. Some interesting findings are that while depth scaling is profoundly important to accuracy, it results in significantly increased cost to interpretability. On the other hand, width scaling balances reasonable accuracy with a level of interpretability at least comparable to less sophisticated models. Such findings feed into the discussion over how to design transparent and explainable deep learning models that will allow for more trustworthy and accountable AI solutions to be designed for real-world applications.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Procedia Computer Science
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2025.04.629
Primary Topic
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Towards Transparent Deep Learning: Assessing Model Accuracy and Interpretability in CNNs

S.R. Singh, Neelu Jyothi Ahuja
Procedia Computer Science
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
article

Towards Transparent Deep Learning: Assessing Model Accuracy and Interpretability in CNNs

S.R. Singh, Neelu Jyothi Ahuja
article en

Abstract

In this work, various CNN architectures that include the baseline, width-scaled, as well as depth-scaled designs were measured and their performance based on top-(1, 3, 5) accuracy. The baseline reported 71.47% Top-1, 91.99% Top-3, and 97.33% Top-5 with 361,034 parameters. Using scaling, the width of the model increased up to 75.24% (Top-1), 93.40% (Top-3), and 97.63% (Top-5) with parameterization increased to 1,430,666. The depth-scaled model achieved the best accuracy in Top-(1,3,5) as 81.99%, 95.67%, and 98.70%, respectively; however, such a model imposes a whopping 24,492,234 parameters on the complexity level. Advanced visualization techniques like Integrated Grad-CAM and LIME have been used for a better understanding of model behaviour. The results depict the fact that deeper models capture more detailed information, but this also introduces noise. The width-scaled model shows a balance between accuracy and interpretability as applied. Further analysis will further unveil the hard trade-of between accuracy and interpretability across the different variants of CNNs. In baseline, width-scaled, and depth-scaled models, two properties were analysed. In this work, the baseline model utilized its simplest architecture as a reference point, then scaled the width and depth of each net to try to improve performance. Accuracy and interpretability have been investigated through visualization techniques: integrated gradients and LIME. Some interesting findings are that while depth scaling is profoundly important to accuracy, it results in significantly increased cost to interpretability. On the other hand, width scaling balances reasonable accuracy with a level of interpretability at least comparable to less sophisticated models. Such findings feed into the discussion over how to design transparent and explainable deep learning models that will allow for more trustworthy and accountable AI solutions to be designed for real-world applications.

Procedia Computer ScienceVol. 258
University of Petroleum and Energy Studies (IN)
University of Petroleum and Energy Studies
Openalex Percentile: Top 95%
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.