Return‐To‐Sport Assessments After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury: Which Jump‐Landing Test Is Sensitive to an ACL‐Injury History Under Fatigued or NonFatigued Conditions?

Accurately identifying residual biomechanical deficits following an anterior cruciate ligament injury is critical for effective rehabilitation and safe return to sport. This study aimed to determine which of four jump-landing tasks demonstrated the greatest sensitivity in distinguishing individuals with a history of ACL injury from healthy controls. Forty-three participants formed the ACL (n = 21, 11 females) and the control group (n = 22, 12 females). Three-dimensional motion data (Vicon, 250 Hz) were recorded during a single-leg hop, unilateral countermovement jump, unilateral crossover hop, and medial-rotation hop before and after a fatigue-inducing intervention (single-leg squats and step-ups). Logistic regression models to classify participants were built using 13 lower-body, trunk, and pelvis joint angles at 50 ms after initial ground contact, angular changes in these angles between 50 and 80 ms, and principal components derived from these variables. Classification rates and individual classification outcomes were assessed. The results revealed that no single jump-landing task consistently outperformed others in detecting ACL injury history. Classification outcomes were influenced by fatigue state and analytical approaches. Fatigue was found to enhance classification rates. Combining joint angles with their temporal changes improved classification rates compared to using joint angles alone. However, applying principal component analysis as a preprocessing step did not consistently enhance model performance. Overall, the study demonstrated that jump-landing tasks, combined with a variety of analytical approaches, can effectively detect ACL injury history. Fatigue enhanced classification outcomes, suggesting that it amplifies differences between post-injury and healthy movement characteristics.