Comparing the Cost of Administering and Monitoring Vancomycin and Daptomycin Through a Home Infusion Pharmacy

Introduction This study evaluates the cost differences between administering and monitoring vancomycin and daptomycin in a home infusion pharmacy (HIP) setting. Both antibiotics are widely used for treating methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and other gram-positive infections in outpatient parenteral antibiotic therapy (OPAT), but vancomycin requires more intensive therapeutic monitoring than daptomycin. The study aims to quantify pharmacist time spent monitoring patients, lab costs, and overall drug administration costs associated with each therapy in a HIP serving 16 medical centers in Northern California. Methods Using a retrospective chart review of 113 patients who received either vancomycin or daptomycin between August and December 2022, the study compares pharmacist time spent, drug and administration device costs, and laboratory costs for each therapy. Results Results show that while pharmacist time spent per note was similar for both antibiotics, vancomycin patients required significantly more notes per therapy day, resulting in higher monitoring costs. The average daily pharmacist time and associated costs for vancomycin were significantly higher than for daptomycin ($37.99 vs. $22.60 per day). Additionally, vancomycin required more frequent and expensive lab tests, leading to higher laboratory costs ($14.01 vs. $5.24 per day). Discussion The overall cost per therapy day for vancomycin was significantly higher than for daptomycin ($84.56 vs. $59.75), largely due to increased pharmacist time and lab costs, despite the similar cost of drug and administration devices. The study highlights the potential cost savings of using daptomycin over vancomycin in a home infusion setting, particularly for uncomplicated infections. However, limitations include the exclusion of complex clinical scenarios and the potential variation in costs across different health care systems. Conclusions These findings suggest that daptomycin may be a more cost-effective alternative to vancomycin for home-based therapy, prompting further evaluation of clinical practices and resource allocation in HIP services.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Infusion Journal
Published
2024-11-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.70776/jecb9600
Primary Topic
Antimicrobial Resistance in Staphylococcus
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparing the Cost of Administering and Monitoring Vancomycin and Daptomycin Through a Home Infusion Pharmacy

Maria Zahiri, Katherine Yang, Meredith Silverman, K. C. Wong et al.
Infusion Journal
Antimicrobial Resistance in Staphylococcus
article

Comparing the Cost of Administering and Monitoring Vancomycin and Daptomycin Through a Home Infusion Pharmacy

Maria Zahiri, Katherine Yang, Meredith Silverman, K. C. Wong, Wendy Morimoto
article en

Abstract

Introduction This study evaluates the cost differences between administering and monitoring vancomycin and daptomycin in a home infusion pharmacy (HIP) setting. Both antibiotics are widely used for treating methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and other gram-positive infections in outpatient parenteral antibiotic therapy (OPAT), but vancomycin requires more intensive therapeutic monitoring than daptomycin. The study aims to quantify pharmacist time spent monitoring patients, lab costs, and overall drug administration costs associated with each therapy in a HIP serving 16 medical centers in Northern California. Methods Using a retrospective chart review of 113 patients who received either vancomycin or daptomycin between August and December 2022, the study compares pharmacist time spent, drug and administration device costs, and laboratory costs for each therapy. Results Results show that while pharmacist time spent per note was similar for both antibiotics, vancomycin patients required significantly more notes per therapy day, resulting in higher monitoring costs. The average daily pharmacist time and associated costs for vancomycin were significantly higher than for daptomycin ($37.99 vs. $22.60 per day). Additionally, vancomycin required more frequent and expensive lab tests, leading to higher laboratory costs ($14.01 vs. $5.24 per day). Discussion The overall cost per therapy day for vancomycin was significantly higher than for daptomycin ($84.56 vs. $59.75), largely due to increased pharmacist time and lab costs, despite the similar cost of drug and administration devices. The study highlights the potential cost savings of using daptomycin over vancomycin in a home infusion setting, particularly for uncomplicated infections. However, limitations include the exclusion of complex clinical scenarios and the potential variation in costs across different health care systems. Conclusions These findings suggest that daptomycin may be a more cost-effective alternative to vancomycin for home-based therapy, prompting further evaluation of clinical practices and resource allocation in HIP services.

Infusion JournalVol. 3(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Antimicrobial Resistance in Staphylococcus
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.