No-tillage effects in bean cultivation and the application of fomesafen on soil dynamics

Soil quality is defined as the measure of its capacity to perform vital ecological functions for agricultural development. With the expansion of cultivated areas and even their exposure to long periods without plant presence, issues such as erosion and soil nutrient depletion can arise. Therefore, practices like crop rotation or the incorporation of green manures have gained traction in soil preparation for large-scale cultivation. The common bean plant, being a member of the legume family, possesses such capabilities, being a potential nitrogen fixer and contributing to soil maintenance. Thus, this study aimed to assess the effects of cultivating common beans in fallow areas with sugarcane straw and fomesafen application. The experiment was conducted in an area with Eutrophic-Dystrophic Red Latosol. The experimental design was a randomized block design in a 4x2 factorial system, with four replicates, considering leaves straw presence (0, 1, 5, and 10 t ha-1) and two types of herbicide application (with and without application), totaling 8 experimental treatments and 32 plots. Soil chemistry, soil enzymatic activity, leaf area, plant dry matter, and productivity were evaluated. Higher straw quantities in the system improved soil enzymatic activity dynamics and soil chemistry. Plant development was correlated with higher soil enzymatic activity. Thus, it is concluded that in fallow areas: 1) the straw enhances soil quality and common bean productivity; 2) The herbicide (fomesafen) application has no impact on soil dynamics; 3) chemical, physical, and biological soil variables show worse conditions in treatments without straw, regardless of herbicide application; 4) enzymatic activity (β-glucosidase) is higher in the interaction between straw and plants, responding better to soil dynamics compared to physical and chemical variables, resulting in higher common bean productivity. It is recommended to maintain or increase straw coverage to improve soil quality and common bean productivity, with the safe use of the herbicide fomesafen, as it does not negatively affect soil dynamics.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Australian Journal of Crop Science
Published
2025-03-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21475/ajcs.25.19.03.p231
Primary Topic
Agronomic Practices and Intercropping Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

No-tillage effects in bean cultivation and the application of fomesafen on soil dynamics

Pedro Gomes Peixoto, Pedro Luís da Costa Aguiar Alves, Vanesca Korasaki, Heytor Lemos Martins et al.
Australian Journal of Crop Science
Agronomic Practices and Intercropping Systems
article

No-tillage effects in bean cultivation and the application of fomesafen on soil dynamics

Pedro Gomes Peixoto, Pedro Luís da Costa Aguiar Alves, Vanesca Korasaki, Heytor Lemos Martins, Eduardo da Silva Martins, Vagner A. Benedito, Arthur Nardi Campalle, Gabriela de Sousa Barbosa
article en

Abstract

Soil quality is defined as the measure of its capacity to perform vital ecological functions for agricultural development. With the expansion of cultivated areas and even their exposure to long periods without plant presence, issues such as erosion and soil nutrient depletion can arise. Therefore, practices like crop rotation or the incorporation of green manures have gained traction in soil preparation for large-scale cultivation. The common bean plant, being a member of the legume family, possesses such capabilities, being a potential nitrogen fixer and contributing to soil maintenance. Thus, this study aimed to assess the effects of cultivating common beans in fallow areas with sugarcane straw and fomesafen application. The experiment was conducted in an area with Eutrophic-Dystrophic Red Latosol. The experimental design was a randomized block design in a 4x2 factorial system, with four replicates, considering leaves straw presence (0, 1, 5, and 10 t ha-1) and two types of herbicide application (with and without application), totaling 8 experimental treatments and 32 plots. Soil chemistry, soil enzymatic activity, leaf area, plant dry matter, and productivity were evaluated. Higher straw quantities in the system improved soil enzymatic activity dynamics and soil chemistry. Plant development was correlated with higher soil enzymatic activity. Thus, it is concluded that in fallow areas: 1) the straw enhances soil quality and common bean productivity; 2) The herbicide (fomesafen) application has no impact on soil dynamics; 3) chemical, physical, and biological soil variables show worse conditions in treatments without straw, regardless of herbicide application; 4) enzymatic activity (β-glucosidase) is higher in the interaction between straw and plants, responding better to soil dynamics compared to physical and chemical variables, resulting in higher common bean productivity. It is recommended to maintain or increase straw coverage to improve soil quality and common bean productivity, with the safe use of the herbicide fomesafen, as it does not negatively affect soil dynamics.

Australian Journal of Crop ScienceVol. 19(03)
Universidade do Estado de Minas Gerais (BR), Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) (BR)
Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior, Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico
Openalex Percentile: Top 87%
Agronomic Practices and Intercropping Systems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.