VALIDATION OF CRITICAL THINKING SKILLS SCALE (CTSS) FOR UNIVERSITY STUDENTS

Abstract: The cultivation of critical thinking skills is paramount for students, notably at the tertiary education level. The objective of this study is to determine the factor structure of an instrument, the Critical Thinking Skill Scale (CTSS henceforth) . The instrument utilised in this study encompasses five skills that are important in students’ critical thinking skills, namely (1) interpretation, (2) analysis, (3) inference, (4) evaluation, (5) explanation. A two-stage sampling procedure was implemented, and the first stage involved selecting undergraduates to build a pool of samples. Subsequently, snowball sampling was employed in the second stage. Collectively, a total of one hundred eighty-two responses were obtained. The data underwent descriptive analysis, reliability analysis, and exploratory factor analysis (EFA). This 49-item instrument obtained a reliability score of 0.982, which translates as an excellent measure of critical thinking skills. The exploratory factor analysis revealed that the scale retained one component only, instead of the original five, which explains 53.714%. Another notable finding in this study was that one item was removed from the first component. The validation of this instrument will not only deepen the critical thinking skills measurement literature, but also sheds light on the critical thinking sub-skills that need to be cultivated across all learning programmes. Keywords: Critical Thinking; Critical Thinking Skills Scale; CTSS; Exploratory Factor Analysis; EFA

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Asian People Journal (APJ)
Published
2025-04-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.37231/apj.2025.8.1.669
Primary Topic
Education and Critical Thinking Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

VALIDATION OF CRITICAL THINKING SKILLS SCALE (CTSS) FOR UNIVERSITY STUDENTS

Nadia Anuar, Fairuz Husna Mohd Yusoff, Khairunnisa Mohd Daud, Zulaikha Khairuddin et al.
Asian People Journal (APJ)
Education and Critical Thinking Development
article

VALIDATION OF CRITICAL THINKING SKILLS SCALE (CTSS) FOR UNIVERSITY STUDENTS

Nadia Anuar, Fairuz Husna Mohd Yusoff, Khairunnisa Mohd Daud, Zulaikha Khairuddin, Salina Sabri, Syafiqah Johan Amir Johan, Onaliza Satimin
article en

Abstract

Abstract: The cultivation of critical thinking skills is paramount for students, notably at the tertiary education level. The objective of this study is to determine the factor structure of an instrument, the Critical Thinking Skill Scale (CTSS henceforth) . The instrument utilised in this study encompasses five skills that are important in students’ critical thinking skills, namely (1) interpretation, (2) analysis, (3) inference, (4) evaluation, (5) explanation. A two-stage sampling procedure was implemented, and the first stage involved selecting undergraduates to build a pool of samples. Subsequently, snowball sampling was employed in the second stage. Collectively, a total of one hundred eighty-two responses were obtained. The data underwent descriptive analysis, reliability analysis, and exploratory factor analysis (EFA). This 49-item instrument obtained a reliability score of 0.982, which translates as an excellent measure of critical thinking skills. The exploratory factor analysis revealed that the scale retained one component only, instead of the original five, which explains 53.714%. Another notable finding in this study was that one item was removed from the first component. The validation of this instrument will not only deepen the critical thinking skills measurement literature, but also sheds light on the critical thinking sub-skills that need to be cultivated across all learning programmes. Keywords: Critical Thinking; Critical Thinking Skills Scale; CTSS; Exploratory Factor Analysis; EFA

Asian People Journal (APJ)Vol. 8(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Education and Critical Thinking Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.