Why has the Brazilian Cerrado been left behind by voluntary environmental policies?

• Brazil’s biodiverse Cerrado biome is overlooked in environmental policies. • We analyzed the factors influencing conservation policy adoption in the soy supply chain. • Public awareness drove policy adoption in the Amazon but not Cerrado. • Empowered far-right politics constrained companies’ environmental policy adoption. • A policy window to adopt Cerrado conservation policy is now open. The expansion of soy production has been a deforestation driver in Brazil in both the Amazon and the highly biodiverse Cerrado savannah ecosystem. To tackle this problem the soy industry implemented a sector-wide zero-deforestation policy in 2006 in the Amazon called the Soy Moratorium. The Soy Moratorium sharply reduced the soy-driven deforestation in the Amazon. However, to date, despite substantial soy deforestation, the neighbouring Cerrado remains unprotected. Here we ask why no comparable zero-deforestation agreement was implemented in the Cerrado. To answer this question, we integrated theory on policy adoption and selection from the voluntary environmental policy literature with theory on policy process and feasibility from public policy, political economy, and organizational theory. This expanded framework enabled us to better understand how historical, political and geographical contextual factors shaped the differing policy adoption outcomes in the Amazon and Cerrado. We then conducted 26 in-depth interviews, including with key private sector decision-makers on policy adoption to understand the relative importance of different potential factors. We found that the differences in public awareness, national politics and narratives, changes in trade relationships, leadership and sunk investments influenced why an agreement emerged in the Amazon and not the Cerrado. Despite these circumstances, a new political window for Cerrado conservation policies has recently emerged with Brazil’s political shifts to a left-centre coalition and efforts to extend new due-diligence deforestation regulations to other wooded lands, including the Cerrado.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Global Environmental Change
Published
2025-05-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2025.103005
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.21

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Why has the Brazilian Cerrado been left behind by voluntary environmental policies?

Joyce Brandão, Rachael Devorah Garrett, F. A. Cardoso
2 citations
Global Environmental Change
Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
2.21
article

Why has the Brazilian Cerrado been left behind by voluntary environmental policies?

Joyce Brandão, Rachael Devorah Garrett, F. A. Cardoso
article en
2 citations

Abstract

• Brazil’s biodiverse Cerrado biome is overlooked in environmental policies. • We analyzed the factors influencing conservation policy adoption in the soy supply chain. • Public awareness drove policy adoption in the Amazon but not Cerrado. • Empowered far-right politics constrained companies’ environmental policy adoption. • A policy window to adopt Cerrado conservation policy is now open. The expansion of soy production has been a deforestation driver in Brazil in both the Amazon and the highly biodiverse Cerrado savannah ecosystem. To tackle this problem the soy industry implemented a sector-wide zero-deforestation policy in 2006 in the Amazon called the Soy Moratorium. The Soy Moratorium sharply reduced the soy-driven deforestation in the Amazon. However, to date, despite substantial soy deforestation, the neighbouring Cerrado remains unprotected. Here we ask why no comparable zero-deforestation agreement was implemented in the Cerrado. To answer this question, we integrated theory on policy adoption and selection from the voluntary environmental policy literature with theory on policy process and feasibility from public policy, political economy, and organizational theory. This expanded framework enabled us to better understand how historical, political and geographical contextual factors shaped the differing policy adoption outcomes in the Amazon and Cerrado. We then conducted 26 in-depth interviews, including with key private sector decision-makers on policy adoption to understand the relative importance of different potential factors. We found that the differences in public awareness, national politics and narratives, changes in trade relationships, leadership and sunk investments influenced why an agreement emerged in the Amazon and not the Cerrado. Despite these circumstances, a new political window for Cerrado conservation policies has recently emerged with Brazil’s political shifts to a left-centre coalition and efforts to extend new due-diligence deforestation regulations to other wooded lands, including the Cerrado.

Global Environmental ChangeVol. 92
University of Cambridge (GB), Film Independent (US), Conservation Leadership Programme (GB)
European Commission, European Research Council, H2020 European Research Council
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
2.21
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.