Quo vadis, Georgia? The political strategy of a conservative twist in the new cycle of populism under Georgian Dream rule (2020–24)

This article argues that the ruling Georgian Dream party promoted populist-conservative discourse to set value borders with the European Union (EU). The populist rhetoric denounces the liberal project of Europe as inconsistent with the traditional-conservative and Orthodox-religious values of Georgia and synchronises its policy with the populist-conservatists within the EU on the issue of sovereignty. The article analyses the transformation of the foreign policy of the Georgian Dream towards the EU through applying the demarcation–integration cleavages crystallised by the Georgian Dream party to the populist radical right-wing direction. The article grounds populism as a discourse created by the ruling Georgian Dream party through the strategy of radicalisation, setting the new demarcation–integration cleavages. The conservative-populist discourse constructs the Georgian people as a cultural unit confined within the Georgian nation-state and is used as a strategy to selectively oppose or undermine the idea of European integration. The article uses a discourse-historical approach, collecting and analysing information related to particular past events and allowing predictions for the future. A process-tracing method, in its causal inference line, reconstructs the changing political tendencies through an analysis of the public speeches and state-of-the-union addresses of leading figures of the Georgian Dream party, as well as commentaries and policy papers. The article demonstrates that populist-conservative rhetoric enabled the ruling Georgian Dream to hijack the domestic discourse and left opposition parties with the choice of whether to respond to its populist-conservative messages before the parliamentary elections of October 2024.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Global Discourse
Published
2025-05-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1332/20437897y2025d000000063
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Populism, Right-Wing Movements
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.52
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Quo vadis, Georgia? The political strategy of a conservative twist in the new cycle of populism under Georgian Dream rule (2020–24)

David Matsaberidze
1 citations
Global Discourse
Populism, Right-Wing Movements
8.52
article

Quo vadis, Georgia? The political strategy of a conservative twist in the new cycle of populism under Georgian Dream rule (2020–24)

David Matsaberidze
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This article argues that the ruling Georgian Dream party promoted populist-conservative discourse to set value borders with the European Union (EU). The populist rhetoric denounces the liberal project of Europe as inconsistent with the traditional-conservative and Orthodox-religious values of Georgia and synchronises its policy with the populist-conservatists within the EU on the issue of sovereignty. The article analyses the transformation of the foreign policy of the Georgian Dream towards the EU through applying the demarcation–integration cleavages crystallised by the Georgian Dream party to the populist radical right-wing direction. The article grounds populism as a discourse created by the ruling Georgian Dream party through the strategy of radicalisation, setting the new demarcation–integration cleavages. The conservative-populist discourse constructs the Georgian people as a cultural unit confined within the Georgian nation-state and is used as a strategy to selectively oppose or undermine the idea of European integration. The article uses a discourse-historical approach, collecting and analysing information related to particular past events and allowing predictions for the future. A process-tracing method, in its causal inference line, reconstructs the changing political tendencies through an analysis of the public speeches and state-of-the-union addresses of leading figures of the Georgian Dream party, as well as commentaries and policy papers. The article demonstrates that populist-conservative rhetoric enabled the ruling Georgian Dream to hijack the domestic discourse and left opposition parties with the choice of whether to respond to its populist-conservative messages before the parliamentary elections of October 2024.

Global Discourse
Tbilisi State University (GE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Populism, Right-Wing Movements
8.52
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.