Richness and Ambiguity: Mapping Artificial Intelligence Labels in Human-AI Collaboration Research

Artificial intelligence has rapidly gained prominence across industries and academia. However, its swift diffusion, coupled with the interdisciplinary nature of related studies, has resulted in fragmented literature, making it challenging to align diverse perspectives under shared and identifiable research trajectories. This challenge became evident while working with data from a systematic literature review we previously conducted on artificial intelligence in human-AI collaboration studies within design-related fields. Building upon this dataset, we examined how researchers label artificial intelligence in their work, recognising terminology as a central factor contributing to this fragmentation. Through an exploratory study, we identified 79 unique labels, categorising them into primary and secondary keywords. Using this data, we developed a tripartite network visualisation to map the relationships between these labels, offering insights into their specificity and the perspectives they represent. To examine the network’s interpretive potential, we engaged three design researchers in a hands-on activity, analysing how they navigated the network in relation to their research work. The findings of this study highlight the value of labels as a positional tool capable of reflecting both the richness and ambiguity of the discourse. Our analysis suggests that the network can aid practical applications, such as clarifying terminology, situating research within the broader field, stimulating critical reflection, and fostering collective discussions. Our main contribution to knowledge lies in presenting a novel framework for addressing the fragmentation of artificial intelligence literature. By reflecting on how labels and their interconnections can uncover underlying research trajectories, this framework fosters alignment while valuing and clarifying the multiplicity of perspectives, moving away from pursuing a singular, unified view.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-05-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21606/eksig2025.126
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Richness and Ambiguity: Mapping Artificial Intelligence Labels in Human-AI Collaboration Research

Alessio Facchin, Beatrice Gobbo, Fabio Antonio Figoli, Francesca Mattioli
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

Richness and Ambiguity: Mapping Artificial Intelligence Labels in Human-AI Collaboration Research

Alessio Facchin, Beatrice Gobbo, Fabio Antonio Figoli, Francesca Mattioli
article en

Abstract

Artificial intelligence has rapidly gained prominence across industries and academia. However, its swift diffusion, coupled with the interdisciplinary nature of related studies, has resulted in fragmented literature, making it challenging to align diverse perspectives under shared and identifiable research trajectories. This challenge became evident while working with data from a systematic literature review we previously conducted on artificial intelligence in human-AI collaboration studies within design-related fields. Building upon this dataset, we examined how researchers label artificial intelligence in their work, recognising terminology as a central factor contributing to this fragmentation. Through an exploratory study, we identified 79 unique labels, categorising them into primary and secondary keywords. Using this data, we developed a tripartite network visualisation to map the relationships between these labels, offering insights into their specificity and the perspectives they represent. To examine the network’s interpretive potential, we engaged three design researchers in a hands-on activity, analysing how they navigated the network in relation to their research work. The findings of this study highlight the value of labels as a positional tool capable of reflecting both the richness and ambiguity of the discourse. Our analysis suggests that the network can aid practical applications, such as clarifying terminology, situating research within the broader field, stimulating critical reflection, and fostering collective discussions. Our main contribution to knowledge lies in presenting a novel framework for addressing the fragmentation of artificial intelligence literature. By reflecting on how labels and their interconnections can uncover underlying research trajectories, this framework fosters alignment while valuing and clarifying the multiplicity of perspectives, moving away from pursuing a singular, unified view.

Politecnico di Milano (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.