Materializing Data: A Macramé-Inspired Framework for Evaluating the Effectiveness of Creative Participatory Research

This paper presents the development of a macramé-inspired framework for evaluating the effectiveness of creative participatory research (CPR), addressing gaps in conventional framework models that overlook the complex, multidimensional and experiential nature of these research approaches. The framework was designed to visualize and materialize the evolving nature of CPR, where participant engagement, contextual factors, and the sometimes organic and unpredictable creative activities shape both the research process and its outcomes. To achieve this, we worked with a group of experienced researchers with expertise in participatory textile-making methods in a series of three online workshops. Through these sessions, the research team explored the challenges of evaluating creative participatory approaches to research, critiqued existing evaluation framework models and developed potential alternatives before finalising the proposed macramé-inspired framework prototype presented here. The resulting framework employs macramé components such cords, interconnecting knots, and anchor points metaphorically to highlight different aspects of creative participatory research processes including the research context, participant engagement levels, project scope and duration, key research activities and participant interactions. In order to support robust evaluation of research effectiveness, we have devised question prompts to encourage shared reflection and discussion between researcher(s) and participants, rather than the one-sided assessment more usually offered by a set of fixed evaluation ‘criteria’, thereby shifting the focus from static metrics to embodied, experiential data. The prototype macramé framework presented here has the potential to be adapted to a diverse range of creative participatory projects beyond its origins in participatory textile-making. We anticipate it to be particularly useful for researchers and practitioners seeking evaluation models that highlight experiential knowledge, contextual nuance and participant agency experienced ‘live’ in the unpredictable contexts of creative participatory research. Future research plans for this experimental prototype framework will include testing through case studies of real-life contextualised research settings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-05-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21606/eksig2025.107
Primary Topic
Participatory Visual Research Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Materializing Data: A Macramé-Inspired Framework for Evaluating the Effectiveness of Creative Participatory Research

Fiona Hackney, Berit Bliesemann de Guevara, Asha Ward, Emma Shercliff et al.
Participatory Visual Research Methods
article

Materializing Data: A Macramé-Inspired Framework for Evaluating the Effectiveness of Creative Participatory Research

Fiona Hackney, Berit Bliesemann de Guevara, Asha Ward, Emma Shercliff, Angelika Strohmayer, Amy Twigger Holroyd, Chinelo Njaka, Eliana Sánchez-Aldana, Claire Wellesley-Smith
article en

Abstract

This paper presents the development of a macramé-inspired framework for evaluating the effectiveness of creative participatory research (CPR), addressing gaps in conventional framework models that overlook the complex, multidimensional and experiential nature of these research approaches. The framework was designed to visualize and materialize the evolving nature of CPR, where participant engagement, contextual factors, and the sometimes organic and unpredictable creative activities shape both the research process and its outcomes. To achieve this, we worked with a group of experienced researchers with expertise in participatory textile-making methods in a series of three online workshops. Through these sessions, the research team explored the challenges of evaluating creative participatory approaches to research, critiqued existing evaluation framework models and developed potential alternatives before finalising the proposed macramé-inspired framework prototype presented here. The resulting framework employs macramé components such cords, interconnecting knots, and anchor points metaphorically to highlight different aspects of creative participatory research processes including the research context, participant engagement levels, project scope and duration, key research activities and participant interactions. In order to support robust evaluation of research effectiveness, we have devised question prompts to encourage shared reflection and discussion between researcher(s) and participants, rather than the one-sided assessment more usually offered by a set of fixed evaluation ‘criteria’, thereby shifting the focus from static metrics to embodied, experiential data. The prototype macramé framework presented here has the potential to be adapted to a diverse range of creative participatory projects beyond its origins in participatory textile-making. We anticipate it to be particularly useful for researchers and practitioners seeking evaluation models that highlight experiential knowledge, contextual nuance and participant agency experienced ‘live’ in the unpredictable contexts of creative participatory research. Future research plans for this experimental prototype framework will include testing through case studies of real-life contextualised research settings.

Manchester Metropolitan University (GB), The Open University (GB), Arts University Bournemouth (GB), Northumbria University (GB), Nottingham Trent University (GB)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 87%
Participatory Visual Research Methods
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.