Antioxidant Activity of Natural Chamomile and Commercial Chamomile in Libya: A Comparative Study
Chamomile (Matricaria chamomilla L.) is a medical plant known for its antioxidant properties, which are attributed to bioactive compounds such as flavonoids and terpenoids. The study aimed to compare the antioxidant efficacy of natural chamomile with three commercial brands, A (Italian chamomile (Sonny)), B (Italian chamomile (Restora)), and C (German chamomile (UTZ)) available in Libyan markets. Methanol extracts of all samples were prepared by maceration, and antioxidant activity was evaluated using the DPPH radical scavenging assay. All data were expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD). Statistical analysis was performed using one-way ANOVA, with A p-value < 0.05, which was considered statistically significant. Results revealed significant differences in IC50 values, with natural chamomile exhibiting the highest potency (IC50 = 3.35 mg/ml ± 0.055), followed by Brand A (IC50= 3.56 mg/ml ± 0.04) and Brand C (3.88 mg/ml ± 0.21). Brand B showed the weakest activity (IC50= 5.01 mg/ml ± 0.04). The statistical analysis confirmed the superiority of natural chamomile over commercial variants. Our findings suggest that processing methods, storage conditions, or potential additives in commercial products may degrade bioactive compounds, reducing antioxidant efficacy. This study highlights the advantage of minimally processed natural chamomile for optimal antioxidant benefits, and it underscores the implications for consumer choice and quality control in the manufacturing of herbal products.
Authors
- Ashraf Alapid (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1522-9970)
- Mohamed Alshintari (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0007-3015-769X)
Institutions
- University of Tripoli (LY)
- Center for Solar Energy Research and Studies (LY)
- Libyan Academy (LY)
- University of Gharyan (LY)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Libyan Medical Journal
- Published
- 2025-05-09
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.69667/lmj.2517213
- Primary Topic
- Dye analysis and toxicity
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00