Availability and completeness of real-world data in United States community oncology/hematology practices regarding chimeric antigen receptor (CAR T)-cell therapy for relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma

This retrospective, observational study evaluated real-world data (RWD) completeness for 65 adults with relapsed/refractory (R/R) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) treated with chimeric antigen receptor (CAR T)-cell therapy across 11 community practices in 2019. Eligible patients had ≥6 months of follow-up, excluding those who died earlier, had CNS metastases, or participated in clinical trials. Physicians abstracted electronic medical records (EMRs) in 2021 using standardized case report forms (eCRFs), capturing demographics, prior therapies, referral/infusion timelines, toxicities, hospitalizations, and survival. Data underwent quality validation. Baseline demographics were fully documented: 70.8% of patients had good performance status (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group [ECOG] 0-1), 73.8% had elevated lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), and 83.9% were deemed high-risk. Hospitalization and emergency visit records were 100% complete, whereas toxicity documentation ranged from 86.2% to 98.5%. Patients received a median 3 prior therapy lines; key barriers to CAR-T therapy referral included patient choice (45.5%), center location (36.4%), and logistics (27.3%). Rapid disease progression precluded treatment in 81.8% of nonrecipients. Only 43.1% had leukapheresis dates recorded, with a 4.5-month median from relapse to infusion. Posttreatment, 75.0% developed CRS and 67.7% had fever. At median 15.5-month follow-up, 44.6% relapsed and 47.7% died. Survival (median progression-free survival, 18.6 months; overall survival, 22.8 months) aligned with trials but revealed disparities in real-world delivery, such as manufacturing delays and incomplete documentation. This study underscores feasibility of robust RWD collection in community settings while highlighting critical gaps—particularly in leukapheresis tracking and postinfusion toxicity reporting—that must be addressed to optimize CAR T-cell therapy management.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Medicine Surgery and Public Health
Published
2025-05-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.glmedi.2025.100200
Citations
1
Primary Topic
CAR-T cell therapy research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.05
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Availability and completeness of real-world data in United States community oncology/hematology practices regarding chimeric antigen receptor (CAR T)-cell therapy for relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma

Richard S. Swain, Alexandrina Balanean, Sarah Lucht, Bindu Kalesan et al.
1 citations
Journal of Medicine Surgery and Public Health
CAR-T cell therapy research
1.05
article

Availability and completeness of real-world data in United States community oncology/hematology practices regarding chimeric antigen receptor (CAR T)-cell therapy for relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma

Richard S. Swain, Alexandrina Balanean, Sarah Lucht, Bindu Kalesan, Tammy A. Schuler, Bruce A. Feinberg, Lindsay McAllister, Djibril Liassou, Ajeet Gajra, David Porter, Andrew J. Klink
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This retrospective, observational study evaluated real-world data (RWD) completeness for 65 adults with relapsed/refractory (R/R) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) treated with chimeric antigen receptor (CAR T)-cell therapy across 11 community practices in 2019. Eligible patients had ≥6 months of follow-up, excluding those who died earlier, had CNS metastases, or participated in clinical trials. Physicians abstracted electronic medical records (EMRs) in 2021 using standardized case report forms (eCRFs), capturing demographics, prior therapies, referral/infusion timelines, toxicities, hospitalizations, and survival. Data underwent quality validation. Baseline demographics were fully documented: 70.8% of patients had good performance status (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group [ECOG] 0-1), 73.8% had elevated lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), and 83.9% were deemed high-risk. Hospitalization and emergency visit records were 100% complete, whereas toxicity documentation ranged from 86.2% to 98.5%. Patients received a median 3 prior therapy lines; key barriers to CAR-T therapy referral included patient choice (45.5%), center location (36.4%), and logistics (27.3%). Rapid disease progression precluded treatment in 81.8% of nonrecipients. Only 43.1% had leukapheresis dates recorded, with a 4.5-month median from relapse to infusion. Posttreatment, 75.0% developed CRS and 67.7% had fever. At median 15.5-month follow-up, 44.6% relapsed and 47.7% died. Survival (median progression-free survival, 18.6 months; overall survival, 22.8 months) aligned with trials but revealed disparities in real-world delivery, such as manufacturing delays and incomplete documentation. This study underscores feasibility of robust RWD collection in community settings while highlighting critical gaps—particularly in leukapheresis tracking and postinfusion toxicity reporting—that must be addressed to optimize CAR T-cell therapy management.

Journal of Medicine Surgery and Public HealthVol. 6
Pennsylvania Hospital (US), Hematology Oncology Associates of Central New York (US), Cardinal Health (United States) (US)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
CAR-T cell therapy research
1.05
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.