Comparative Analysis of Transfer Learning Models for Brain Tumor Detection

Brain tumors rank among the most dangerous and life-threatening conditions, requiring accurate and timely detection for efficient treatment. Conventional diagnosis techniques, which rely on radiologists’ manual interpretation of medical pictures, might be time-consuming and susceptible to inconsistencies. To address these issues, deep learning (DL) models have become effective instruments for automating tumor classification, improving both efficiency and accuracy. In this manuscript, we evaluate the efficiency of various DL models in classifying MRI images as either tumorous or non-tumorous using the BR35H dataset, which includes 2,100 training images and 600 validation images. We assess nine pre-trained transfer learning (TL) models: DenseNet121, MobileNetV2, Inception-V3, MobileNetV3Large, Xception, DenseNet201, VGG16, AlexNet, InceptionResNetV2, and VGG16. Each model is fine-tuned and evaluated using precision, accuracy, recall, and F1-score metrics. Among all the techniques, Xception achieved the greatest accuracy at 98.33%, while MobileNetV3Large exhibited the lowest accuracy at 75.16%. This outcome showed the efficiency of advanced DL models in binary tumor classification, highlighting the importance of model selection in developing accurate and reliable diagnostic tools. Overall, the Xception model stands out as the most promising for automating the detection of tumorous and non-tumorous conditions in MRI images, offering a significant improvement over the traditional diagnostic method.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Procedia Computer Science
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2025.04.504
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Brain Tumor Detection and Classification
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.68
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Analysis of Transfer Learning Models for Brain Tumor Detection

Silky Sachar, Anuj Kumar, Jyoti Jyoti
2 citations
Procedia Computer Science
Brain Tumor Detection and Classification
1.68
article

Comparative Analysis of Transfer Learning Models for Brain Tumor Detection

Silky Sachar, Anuj Kumar, Jyoti Jyoti
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Brain tumors rank among the most dangerous and life-threatening conditions, requiring accurate and timely detection for efficient treatment. Conventional diagnosis techniques, which rely on radiologists’ manual interpretation of medical pictures, might be time-consuming and susceptible to inconsistencies. To address these issues, deep learning (DL) models have become effective instruments for automating tumor classification, improving both efficiency and accuracy. In this manuscript, we evaluate the efficiency of various DL models in classifying MRI images as either tumorous or non-tumorous using the BR35H dataset, which includes 2,100 training images and 600 validation images. We assess nine pre-trained transfer learning (TL) models: DenseNet121, MobileNetV2, Inception-V3, MobileNetV3Large, Xception, DenseNet201, VGG16, AlexNet, InceptionResNetV2, and VGG16. Each model is fine-tuned and evaluated using precision, accuracy, recall, and F1-score metrics. Among all the techniques, Xception achieved the greatest accuracy at 98.33%, while MobileNetV3Large exhibited the lowest accuracy at 75.16%. This outcome showed the efficiency of advanced DL models in binary tumor classification, highlighting the importance of model selection in developing accurate and reliable diagnostic tools. Overall, the Xception model stands out as the most promising for automating the detection of tumorous and non-tumorous conditions in MRI images, offering a significant improvement over the traditional diagnostic method.

Procedia Computer ScienceVol. 258
Amity University (AE), Panjab University (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Brain Tumor Detection and Classification
1.68
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.