A Comparative Analysis of the Performance of Parallel Ensemble and Sequential Ensemble Machine Learning Methods in the Detection of Diabetes Miletus

Diabetes Mellitus still forms a major cause of death rates soaring around the globe, heightening scares regarding shooting up diabetic population in the world; and hence straining health attendants to seek for rapid diagnostic tools specific to an incurable disease as described. Many models have been presented for machine learning as base learners, or else combined ensemble techniques. The performance of parallel and sequential ensemble machine learning approaches in the detection of diabetes mellitus: A comparative study, the parallel ensemble methods include Random Forest, J48, CART and Decision Stump (DS) classifiers and the sequential ensemble method includes XGBoost AdaBoostM1 Gradient Boosting. The data set was 70% training and 30 % testing using the dataset on UCI machine repository site. Python analysis using Jupyter Notebook of this model confirmed that sequential ensemble has a classification accuracy about 6% more than parallel method using the same dataset by applying the 5-fold Cross Validation (CV) technique. XGBoost was also 4% better than 10-fold CV. Sequential machine learning models perform better in predicting diabetes mellitus as per the results. Therefore, the study concludes that sequential ensemble approaches are robust and effective in enhancing early diagnosis of patients. Thus, these models can be employed to develop prospective diabetes mellitus detection systems which in turn contributes to better health outcomes and decreasing the load on healthcare.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Procedia Computer Science
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2025.04.340
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.94
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Comparative Analysis of the Performance of Parallel Ensemble and Sequential Ensemble Machine Learning Methods in the Detection of Diabetes Miletus

Ibrahim Adeyanju, Adewale Opeoluwa Ogunde, Abidemi Emmanuel Adeniyi, Nabeela Temitayo Adebola et al.
1 citations
Procedia Computer Science
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
2.94
article

A Comparative Analysis of the Performance of Parallel Ensemble and Sequential Ensemble Machine Learning Methods in the Detection of Diabetes Miletus

Ibrahim Adeyanju, Adewale Opeoluwa Ogunde, Abidemi Emmanuel Adeniyi, Nabeela Temitayo Adebola, Blessing Oluwatobi Olorunfemi, Federick Oscar
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Diabetes Mellitus still forms a major cause of death rates soaring around the globe, heightening scares regarding shooting up diabetic population in the world; and hence straining health attendants to seek for rapid diagnostic tools specific to an incurable disease as described. Many models have been presented for machine learning as base learners, or else combined ensemble techniques. The performance of parallel and sequential ensemble machine learning approaches in the detection of diabetes mellitus: A comparative study, the parallel ensemble methods include Random Forest, J48, CART and Decision Stump (DS) classifiers and the sequential ensemble method includes XGBoost AdaBoostM1 Gradient Boosting. The data set was 70% training and 30 % testing using the dataset on UCI machine repository site. Python analysis using Jupyter Notebook of this model confirmed that sequential ensemble has a classification accuracy about 6% more than parallel method using the same dataset by applying the 5-fold Cross Validation (CV) technique. XGBoost was also 4% better than 10-fold CV. Sequential machine learning models perform better in predicting diabetes mellitus as per the results. Therefore, the study concludes that sequential ensemble approaches are robust and effective in enhancing early diagnosis of patients. Thus, these models can be employed to develop prospective diabetes mellitus detection systems which in turn contributes to better health outcomes and decreasing the load on healthcare.

Procedia Computer ScienceVol. 258
Bowen University (NG), Redeemer's University (NG), University of Salford (GB), Sheffield Hallam University (GB), University of Abuja (NG)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
2.94
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.