A comparative analysis of PFAS in archive and fresh soil samples in England and implications for large-scale surveys

This research addresses a knowledge gap in the detectability, concentrations, and types of per and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) present in shallow soils in England, UK. While the water environment has been, and continues to be, the subject of significant testing and research for these chemicals, soils are still poorly understood. Estimates of anthropogenic background concentrations of PFAS helps with the assessment of potential contamination scenarios, setting benchmark levels and risk evaluation. This research comprised an assessment of the suitability of using archive soil samples to support contemporary samples to give a preliminary indication of likely anthropogenic background concentrations of PFAS in shallow soils in England. We retrieved 25 archive samples and collected nine contemporary samples from the same geographical location as their paired archive counterpart. Samples were analysed for 53 PFAS with limits of quantification between 0.1 and 0.5 μg/kg dry weight (dw). The results showed that archive samples contained lower concentrations (mean ∑PFAS-53, 1 μg/kg dw) than paired contemporary soil samples (mean ∑PFAS-53, 3 μg/kg dw). The concentrations reported by this study were similar to other surveys at international, national and regional scales. Our study showed that PFAS were detected in both archive and contemporary field samples. Based on the current availability of archive samples in England, contemporary field samples should be used as the primary sample type in future research on background concentrations of PFAS in soils. Archive samples have the potential provide complimentary temporal and compositional insights to support the derivation of background concentrations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environmental Pollution
Published
2025-05-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2025.126401
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.44

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A comparative analysis of PFAS in archive and fresh soil samples in England and implications for large-scale surveys

A. James, Michael G. Hughes, Helen Pickering, S. Alexander Haslam et al.
4 citations
Environmental Pollution
Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances research
3.44
article

A comparative analysis of PFAS in archive and fresh soil samples in England and implications for large-scale surveys

A. James, Michael G. Hughes, Helen Pickering, S. Alexander Haslam, Christopher H. Vane, B. P. Marchant, Darren J. Beriro, Jenny Bearcock, I. Martín
article en
4 citations

Abstract

This research addresses a knowledge gap in the detectability, concentrations, and types of per and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) present in shallow soils in England, UK. While the water environment has been, and continues to be, the subject of significant testing and research for these chemicals, soils are still poorly understood. Estimates of anthropogenic background concentrations of PFAS helps with the assessment of potential contamination scenarios, setting benchmark levels and risk evaluation. This research comprised an assessment of the suitability of using archive soil samples to support contemporary samples to give a preliminary indication of likely anthropogenic background concentrations of PFAS in shallow soils in England. We retrieved 25 archive samples and collected nine contemporary samples from the same geographical location as their paired archive counterpart. Samples were analysed for 53 PFAS with limits of quantification between 0.1 and 0.5 μg/kg dry weight (dw). The results showed that archive samples contained lower concentrations (mean ∑PFAS-53, 1 μg/kg dw) than paired contemporary soil samples (mean ∑PFAS-53, 3 μg/kg dw). The concentrations reported by this study were similar to other surveys at international, national and regional scales. Our study showed that PFAS were detected in both archive and contemporary field samples. Based on the current availability of archive samples in England, contemporary field samples should be used as the primary sample type in future research on background concentrations of PFAS in soils. Archive samples have the potential provide complimentary temporal and compositional insights to support the derivation of background concentrations.

Environmental PollutionVol. 379
British Geological Survey (GB), Environment Agency (GB)
British Geological Survey
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances research
3.44
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.