Machine learning driven prediction of drug efficacy in lung cancer: based on protein biomarkers and clinical features

Currently, chemotherapy drugs are the first-line treatment for lung cancer patients, and evaluating their efficacy is of utmost significance. However, assessing the clinical efficacy of chemotherapy drugs remains a challenging task. In recent years, machine learning, especially artificial intelligence (AI), has emerged as a transformative tool in the field of oncology, capable of integrating multiple clinical and protein biomarkers for more accurate predictions. The study collected clinical data and hematological parameters from 2115 lung cancer patients at Hubei Cancer Hospital. Ten typical machine learning models were selected to predict overall survival and progression-free survival, including Decision Tree, Random Forest, Logistic Regression, k-Nearest Neighbors, AdaBoost, XGBoost, and CatBoost. The study found that the CatBoost model performed best in predicting 3-year overall survival and progression-free survival, with AUCs of 0.97 (0.95-0.99) or 0.95 (0.92-0.98). Additionally, the study further analyzed the performance of different machine learning models in patient mortality risk stratification. The CatBoost model excelled in distinguishing between high-risk and low-risk patients, which demonstrated outstanding performance in survival rate prediction at various time points, particularly in predicting survival rates at 1 year (0.54, 0.68), 3 years (0.05, 0.27), and 5 years (0.01, 0.07). The results showed that these models performed well in distinguishing high-risk from low-risk patients, especially the CatBoost model. Therefore, we suggest that these models, particularly the CatBoost model, could serve as practical clinical prediction tools to assist clinicians in developing better and more reasonable treatment plans.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Life Sciences
Published
2025-05-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lfs.2025.123706
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.44

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Machine learning driven prediction of drug efficacy in lung cancer: based on protein biomarkers and clinical features

Aiping Chen, Jianxin Chen, Jianyu Li, Zhiping Liu et al.
4 citations
Life Sciences
Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
5.44
article

Machine learning driven prediction of drug efficacy in lung cancer: based on protein biomarkers and clinical features

Aiping Chen, Jianxin Chen, Jianyu Li, Zhiping Liu, Chenghe Shi, Jing Zhang, Shaozhong Wei
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Currently, chemotherapy drugs are the first-line treatment for lung cancer patients, and evaluating their efficacy is of utmost significance. However, assessing the clinical efficacy of chemotherapy drugs remains a challenging task. In recent years, machine learning, especially artificial intelligence (AI), has emerged as a transformative tool in the field of oncology, capable of integrating multiple clinical and protein biomarkers for more accurate predictions. The study collected clinical data and hematological parameters from 2115 lung cancer patients at Hubei Cancer Hospital. Ten typical machine learning models were selected to predict overall survival and progression-free survival, including Decision Tree, Random Forest, Logistic Regression, k-Nearest Neighbors, AdaBoost, XGBoost, and CatBoost. The study found that the CatBoost model performed best in predicting 3-year overall survival and progression-free survival, with AUCs of 0.97 (0.95-0.99) or 0.95 (0.92-0.98). Additionally, the study further analyzed the performance of different machine learning models in patient mortality risk stratification. The CatBoost model excelled in distinguishing between high-risk and low-risk patients, which demonstrated outstanding performance in survival rate prediction at various time points, particularly in predicting survival rates at 1 year (0.54, 0.68), 3 years (0.05, 0.27), and 5 years (0.01, 0.07). The results showed that these models performed well in distinguishing high-risk from low-risk patients, especially the CatBoost model. Therefore, we suggest that these models, particularly the CatBoost model, could serve as practical clinical prediction tools to assist clinicians in developing better and more reasonable treatment plans.

Life SciencesVol. 375
Beijing University of Chinese Medicine (CN), Peking University (CN), Peking University Third Hospital (CN), Hubei Cancer Hospital (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, Science and Technology Department of Hubei Province
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
5.44
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.