The paradox of consumer-level open innovation collaborators in sustainable consumption transformation

Sustainable consumption is critical for addressing environmental challenges, yet fostering transformative behavioral shifts remains complex. This study examines the determinants of transformative sustainable consumption behavior, focusing on consumer attitudes toward sustainability, consumer collaboration, and consumer expertise, while also considering the moderating role of consumer tension. By integrating open innovation principles and exploring the paradoxical behaviors and tensions consumers experience in sustainability, the study investigates how these factors influence consumer engagement in sustainable practices and transformative consumption behavior in Thailand. Using partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM), primary data were collected from 324 Thai consumers through quota sampling. The findings highlight key insights into sustainable consumption. Consumer attitudes positively influence engagement (β = 0.153, p = 0.037), yet they negatively impact transformative sustainable consumption behavior (β = -0.148, p = 0.023), revealing an attitude-behavior gap. Consumer collaboration enhances engagement (β = 0.165, p = 0.011) but does not directly affect transformative consumption behavior (β = -0.017, p = 0.847), suggesting that collaborative efforts alone are insufficient to drive transformative change. Conversely, consumer expertise strongly predicts both engagement (β = 0.343, p < 0.001) and transformative behavior (β = 0.175, p = 0.045), highlighting the role of knowledge in fostering sustainability. Additionally, consumer tension significantly impacts transformative behavior (β = 0.247, p = 0.004), demonstrating that internal conflicts—such as financial concerns and convenience trade-offs—shape decision-making. Moderation analysis reveals that expertise buffers the negative effects of tension (β = 0.151, p = 0.005), while attitudes and collaboration are more vulnerable to psychological conflict (β = 0.100, p = 0.054; β = -0.309, p < 0.001). The findings provide practical insights for policymakers and businesses, emphasizing the need for targeted educational initiatives, policy incentives, and structured engagement models to reduce consumer tensions and enhance transformative sustainable consumption behavior.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sustainable Futures
Published
2025-05-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sftr.2025.100662
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.52
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The paradox of consumer-level open innovation collaborators in sustainable consumption transformation

Phaninee Naruetharadhol, Wutthiya Aekthanate Srisathan
2 citations
Sustainable Futures
Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences
5.52
article

The paradox of consumer-level open innovation collaborators in sustainable consumption transformation

Phaninee Naruetharadhol, Wutthiya Aekthanate Srisathan
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Sustainable consumption is critical for addressing environmental challenges, yet fostering transformative behavioral shifts remains complex. This study examines the determinants of transformative sustainable consumption behavior, focusing on consumer attitudes toward sustainability, consumer collaboration, and consumer expertise, while also considering the moderating role of consumer tension. By integrating open innovation principles and exploring the paradoxical behaviors and tensions consumers experience in sustainability, the study investigates how these factors influence consumer engagement in sustainable practices and transformative consumption behavior in Thailand. Using partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM), primary data were collected from 324 Thai consumers through quota sampling. The findings highlight key insights into sustainable consumption. Consumer attitudes positively influence engagement (β = 0.153, p = 0.037), yet they negatively impact transformative sustainable consumption behavior (β = -0.148, p = 0.023), revealing an attitude-behavior gap. Consumer collaboration enhances engagement (β = 0.165, p = 0.011) but does not directly affect transformative consumption behavior (β = -0.017, p = 0.847), suggesting that collaborative efforts alone are insufficient to drive transformative change. Conversely, consumer expertise strongly predicts both engagement (β = 0.343, p < 0.001) and transformative behavior (β = 0.175, p = 0.045), highlighting the role of knowledge in fostering sustainability. Additionally, consumer tension significantly impacts transformative behavior (β = 0.247, p = 0.004), demonstrating that internal conflicts—such as financial concerns and convenience trade-offs—shape decision-making. Moderation analysis reveals that expertise buffers the negative effects of tension (β = 0.151, p = 0.005), while attitudes and collaboration are more vulnerable to psychological conflict (β = 0.100, p = 0.054; β = -0.309, p < 0.001). The findings provide practical insights for policymakers and businesses, emphasizing the need for targeted educational initiatives, policy incentives, and structured engagement models to reduce consumer tensions and enhance transformative sustainable consumption behavior.

Sustainable FuturesVol. 9
Khon Kaen University (TH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences
5.52
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.