Comparison of Muscle Activation and Range of Motion between the Traditional and Landmine Romanian Deadlift

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare levels of trunk, upper- and lower-body muscle activation, and trunk and hip range of motion between the traditional (TRDL) and landmine Romanian deadlift (LRDL). Methods: Nine male and seven female participants (age: 23.2 ± 5.3 yrs; height: 171.7 ± 8.8 cm; weight: 78.7 ± 17.5 kg) with a minimum of six months resistance training experience volunteered and completed the study. Muscle activation and trunk and hip range of motion were time synchronized during the RDL exercises. Maximum voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC) using electromyography (EMG) was assessed for each muscle group (middle trapezius, latissimus dorsi, erector spinae, gluteus maximus, and biceps femoris) for data normalization. The subjects completed three repetitions at an 8RM load for each RDL. Electromyography and inertial measurement unit measures were analyzed using the SPM 1d Version 0.4 for 1-dimensional Statistical Parametric Mapping package for Matlab. Paired t-tests were used to compare the TRDL and LRDL measures during the concentric and eccentric phases with the level of significance set a priori at p <0.05. Results: No significant EMG differences were found in all analyzed muscle groups during the eccentric and concentric phases. Hip and lumbar flexion were also not significantly different between the exercises. Conclusions: Using a similar relative intensity, the TRDL and LRDL produce similar levels of activation in the trunk, upper-body, and lower-body muscle groups. The amount of posterior shifting of the center of mass is similar between the exercises indicated by the similar range of hip and trunk motion. Practical Applications: The data indicate that both RDL exercises can be used interchangeably with no difference in muscle activation or hip and lumbar range of motion.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Strength and Conditioning
Published
2025-05-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.47206/ijsc.v5i1.370
Primary Topic
Muscle activation and electromyography studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of Muscle Activation and Range of Motion between the Traditional and Landmine Romanian Deadlift

Rachel M. Koldenhoven, Kevin McCurdy
International Journal of Strength and Conditioning
Muscle activation and electromyography studies
article

Comparison of Muscle Activation and Range of Motion between the Traditional and Landmine Romanian Deadlift

Rachel M. Koldenhoven, Kevin McCurdy
article en

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare levels of trunk, upper- and lower-body muscle activation, and trunk and hip range of motion between the traditional (TRDL) and landmine Romanian deadlift (LRDL). Methods: Nine male and seven female participants (age: 23.2 ± 5.3 yrs; height: 171.7 ± 8.8 cm; weight: 78.7 ± 17.5 kg) with a minimum of six months resistance training experience volunteered and completed the study. Muscle activation and trunk and hip range of motion were time synchronized during the RDL exercises. Maximum voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC) using electromyography (EMG) was assessed for each muscle group (middle trapezius, latissimus dorsi, erector spinae, gluteus maximus, and biceps femoris) for data normalization. The subjects completed three repetitions at an 8RM load for each RDL. Electromyography and inertial measurement unit measures were analyzed using the SPM 1d Version 0.4 for 1-dimensional Statistical Parametric Mapping package for Matlab. Paired t-tests were used to compare the TRDL and LRDL measures during the concentric and eccentric phases with the level of significance set a priori at p <0.05. Results: No significant EMG differences were found in all analyzed muscle groups during the eccentric and concentric phases. Hip and lumbar flexion were also not significantly different between the exercises. Conclusions: Using a similar relative intensity, the TRDL and LRDL produce similar levels of activation in the trunk, upper-body, and lower-body muscle groups. The amount of posterior shifting of the center of mass is similar between the exercises indicated by the similar range of hip and trunk motion. Practical Applications: The data indicate that both RDL exercises can be used interchangeably with no difference in muscle activation or hip and lumbar range of motion.

International Journal of Strength and ConditioningVol. 5(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
Muscle activation and electromyography studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Comparison of Muscle Activation and Range of Motion between the Traditional and Landmine Romanian Deadlift — Rachel M. Koldenhoven, Kevin McCurdy · International Journal of Strength and Conditioning (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS