Open Versus Laparoscopic Nephrectomy: A Comparative Study in Prince Hussein Urology Center

Introduction: Nephrectomy is indicated in benign and malignant renal conditions. The nephrectomy can be performed through open or laparoscopic approach. Open nephrectomy mostly can accomplish by retroperitoneal method but in some cases transperitoneal approach is mandated (bilateral nephrectomy, locally advanced tumor with invasion to the adjacent structures, and severe traumatic renal injury). Aim: The present study compared the two approaches of nephrectomy regarding the outcomes in Prince Hussein Urology Center. Methods: Retrospectively 300 patients who underwent nephrectomies between August 2016 and July 2023 in Prince Hussein Urology Center were enrolled in this research. 150 patients had open nephrectomy (group1), and 150 patients had laparoscopic nephrectomy (group2). Comparative data: operative time, hospital stay days, postoperative recovery state, early return to work, and perioperative complications (hemorrhage, organ damage, infection, incisional hernia, and reoperation). The follow-up period was for 1 year. Results: The patients’ ages were between (21 and 79 years). No significant differences between both groups regarding the demographic data and in some categorical data (operative time, and operative complications), but there were significant differences regarding the postoperative recovery state, early return to work, and occurrence of incisional hernia in favour of laparoscopic nephrectomy. Postoperative recovery was earlier in group 2 (P < 0.05). Mean operative time, and mean hospitalization length was shorter in group 2 (P = 0.0001), respectively. Operative complications were equal in both groups (P > 0.05). Incisional hernia occurred in 7 patients in group 1 and in one case in group2 (P = 0.029). In spite of the comparable surgical oncologic, and functional outcomes, some literatures advised for further quality studies to evaluate the effectiveness of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy and its postoperative quality of life compared with open partial nephrectomy. Conclusion: The laparoscopic nephrectomy when indicated is superior to open approach because of the lower occurrence of incisional hernia, early postoperative recovery, decreased hospital stay length and early normal activity return. Which overall decreases the cost of nephrectomy surgery.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Advances in Medicine and Medical Research
Published
2025-05-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.9734/jammr/2025/v37i55826
Primary Topic
Pediatric Urology and Nephrology Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Open Versus Laparoscopic Nephrectomy: A Comparative Study in Prince Hussein Urology Center

M. Rawashdeh, Ashraf Suleiman AL-Majali, Belal Abdullah Al-Khawaldah, Mohammad Aref AlFrokh et al.
Journal of Advances in Medicine and Medical Research
Pediatric Urology and Nephrology Studies
article

Open Versus Laparoscopic Nephrectomy: A Comparative Study in Prince Hussein Urology Center

M. Rawashdeh, Ashraf Suleiman AL-Majali, Belal Abdullah Al-Khawaldah, Mohammad Aref AlFrokh, Mutasem K. Alsmadi, Mohammad Nedal Al-Ajlouni, Osama Awad AL-Kaabneh, Awad Bakheet AL-Kaabneh, Mohammad Faisal Mousa, Bassam Mohammad Aldeikeh, Balal Abdulnabi Abunaja, Tareq Ghaleb Alnasser, Ruba Abdelmajeed Al-Smadi, Jihad Refat Asaad, Mohammad Zaid Suleiman Al-Abbadi
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Nephrectomy is indicated in benign and malignant renal conditions. The nephrectomy can be performed through open or laparoscopic approach. Open nephrectomy mostly can accomplish by retroperitoneal method but in some cases transperitoneal approach is mandated (bilateral nephrectomy, locally advanced tumor with invasion to the adjacent structures, and severe traumatic renal injury). Aim: The present study compared the two approaches of nephrectomy regarding the outcomes in Prince Hussein Urology Center. Methods: Retrospectively 300 patients who underwent nephrectomies between August 2016 and July 2023 in Prince Hussein Urology Center were enrolled in this research. 150 patients had open nephrectomy (group1), and 150 patients had laparoscopic nephrectomy (group2). Comparative data: operative time, hospital stay days, postoperative recovery state, early return to work, and perioperative complications (hemorrhage, organ damage, infection, incisional hernia, and reoperation). The follow-up period was for 1 year. Results: The patients’ ages were between (21 and 79 years). No significant differences between both groups regarding the demographic data and in some categorical data (operative time, and operative complications), but there were significant differences regarding the postoperative recovery state, early return to work, and occurrence of incisional hernia in favour of laparoscopic nephrectomy. Postoperative recovery was earlier in group 2 (P < 0.05). Mean operative time, and mean hospitalization length was shorter in group 2 (P = 0.0001), respectively. Operative complications were equal in both groups (P > 0.05). Incisional hernia occurred in 7 patients in group 1 and in one case in group2 (P = 0.029). In spite of the comparable surgical oncologic, and functional outcomes, some literatures advised for further quality studies to evaluate the effectiveness of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy and its postoperative quality of life compared with open partial nephrectomy. Conclusion: The laparoscopic nephrectomy when indicated is superior to open approach because of the lower occurrence of incisional hernia, early postoperative recovery, decreased hospital stay length and early normal activity return. Which overall decreases the cost of nephrectomy surgery.

Journal of Advances in Medicine and Medical ResearchVol. 37(5)
Openalex Percentile: Top 86%
Pediatric Urology and Nephrology Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.