Impact of differential item functioning on item model fit using concurrent equating method

Abstract This study aimed to evaluate the item model fit by equating the forms of the PISA 2018 mathematics subtest with concurrent common items equating in samples from Türkiye, the UK, and Italy. The answers given in mathematics subtest Forms 2, 8, and 12 were used in this context. Analyzes were performed using the Dichotomous Rasch Model in the WINSTEPS program. Concurrent common item equating was used for the equating process in two ways for each country: keeping and removing items showing DIF. Item model fits obtained as a result of concurrent equating analyses were compared between equated form pairs and between selected countries. As a result, when the DIF status of the items was examined, it was observed that the DIF status of the common items varied between forms. In addition, it was concluded that items displaying DIF impacted the functioning of the common items. Therefore, it is recommended that the DIF status of items be taken into account in concurrent equating, as DIF can influence the performance of common items. However, it was observed that the presence of DIF did not significantly impact the equating results when common items that did not function equivalently across forms were removed. When item fit to the model was evaluated in concurrent estimations across countries, the UK emerged as the sample where items best fit the model for Form 2. For Form 8, the best item fit was observed in the Italy sample, while for Form 12, items in both the Italy and UK samples demonstrated better model fit.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Large-scale Assessments in Education
Published
2025-05-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40536-025-00244-z
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.11
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impact of differential item functioning on item model fit using concurrent equating method

Zeynep Uzun, Tuncay Öğretmen
1 citations
Large-scale Assessments in Education
Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
2.11
article

Impact of differential item functioning on item model fit using concurrent equating method

Zeynep Uzun, Tuncay Öğretmen
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract This study aimed to evaluate the item model fit by equating the forms of the PISA 2018 mathematics subtest with concurrent common items equating in samples from Türkiye, the UK, and Italy. The answers given in mathematics subtest Forms 2, 8, and 12 were used in this context. Analyzes were performed using the Dichotomous Rasch Model in the WINSTEPS program. Concurrent common item equating was used for the equating process in two ways for each country: keeping and removing items showing DIF. Item model fits obtained as a result of concurrent equating analyses were compared between equated form pairs and between selected countries. As a result, when the DIF status of the items was examined, it was observed that the DIF status of the common items varied between forms. In addition, it was concluded that items displaying DIF impacted the functioning of the common items. Therefore, it is recommended that the DIF status of items be taken into account in concurrent equating, as DIF can influence the performance of common items. However, it was observed that the presence of DIF did not significantly impact the equating results when common items that did not function equivalently across forms were removed. When item fit to the model was evaluated in concurrent estimations across countries, the UK emerged as the sample where items best fit the model for Form 2. For Form 8, the best item fit was observed in the Italy sample, while for Form 12, items in both the Italy and UK samples demonstrated better model fit.

Large-scale Assessments in EducationVol. 13(1)
Ege University (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
2.11
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.