Party Receptiveness to Interest Group Diversity: Evidence From Policymaking in Six European Democracies

ABSTRACT Legislative party groups regularly get suggestions from numerous, different interest groups trying to influence policy, but individual party groups are likely to be more receptive to suggestions from groups representing some interests than others. We examine (in)equalities in legislative parties' receptiveness to interest group diversity by asking: what factors explain how (un)equally legislative parties listen to and accept suggestions from different types of interest groups? Combining interest group survey data from six long‐established European democracies with data on parties' policy area salience and goal priorities, we find support for three possible party‐level explanations. Legislative parties seem more equally receptive to the suggestions they receive from different interests when their party prioritizes office over policy in cases of goal conflicts and in policy areas of high salience to the party. When party salience is high, more equal party receptiveness is particularly associated with greater willingness to compromise on policy to be in office.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Governance
Published
2025-05-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.70018
Primary Topic
Political Influence and Corporate Strategies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Party Receptiveness to Interest Group Diversity: Evidence From Policymaking in Six European Democracies

Elin Haugsgjerd Allern, Lise Rødland, Vibeke Wøien Hansen
Governance
Political Influence and Corporate Strategies
article

Party Receptiveness to Interest Group Diversity: Evidence From Policymaking in Six European Democracies

Elin Haugsgjerd Allern, Lise Rødland, Vibeke Wøien Hansen
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Legislative party groups regularly get suggestions from numerous, different interest groups trying to influence policy, but individual party groups are likely to be more receptive to suggestions from groups representing some interests than others. We examine (in)equalities in legislative parties' receptiveness to interest group diversity by asking: what factors explain how (un)equally legislative parties listen to and accept suggestions from different types of interest groups? Combining interest group survey data from six long‐established European democracies with data on parties' policy area salience and goal priorities, we find support for three possible party‐level explanations. Legislative parties seem more equally receptive to the suggestions they receive from different interests when their party prioritizes office over policy in cases of goal conflicts and in policy areas of high salience to the party. When party salience is high, more equal party receptiveness is particularly associated with greater willingness to compromise on policy to be in office.

GovernanceVol. 38(3)
King's College London (GB), University of Oslo (NO), Institute for Social Research (NO)
Universitetet i Oslo, Norges Forskningsråd
Openalex Percentile: Top 85%
Political Influence and Corporate Strategies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.