A 2‐Part, Open‐Label, Phase 1 Bioequivalence and Food‐Effect Study of Ubrogepant in Healthy Adult Participants

This Phase 1 study of ubrogepant was conducted to establish the bioequivalence (BE) of the 50- and 100-mg to-be-marketed (TBM) tablet formulations with the clinical trial (CT) 100-mg tablet formulation and evaluate the food effect on the bioavailability of the 100-mg TBM tablet. This 2-part study enrolled healthy participants aged 18-45 years. Part A assessed BE following a single dose of TBM versus CT tablets. Part B evaluated the impact of a high-fat meal on ubrogepant pharmacokinetics. Safety and tolerability were assessed along with standard pharmacokinetic parameters. In Part A (n = 47), the geometric mean ratio and 90% confidence intervals for maximum plasma drug concentration, area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) from time zero to time t, and AUC from time zero to infinity for the TBM and CT formulations demonstrated BE. The time to peak exposure was the same for both formulations. In Part B (n = 18), a high-fat meal delayed time to peak exposure and reduced maximum plasma drug concentration by 22%, with no effect on AUC. The occurrence of treatment-emergent adverse events was low, and the majority were mild. Ubrogepant TBM and CT tablets (1 × 100 mg or 2 × 50 mg) were bioequivalent under fasted conditions, and a high-fat meal had no clinically relevant effect on the bioavailability of the TBM tablet formulation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development
Published
2025-05-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/cpdd.1546
Primary Topic
Pharmaceutical studies and practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A 2‐Part, Open‐Label, Phase 1 Bioequivalence and Food‐Effect Study of Ubrogepant in Healthy Adult Participants

Ramesh Boinpally, Joel M. Trugman
Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development
Pharmaceutical studies and practices
article

A 2‐Part, Open‐Label, Phase 1 Bioequivalence and Food‐Effect Study of Ubrogepant in Healthy Adult Participants

Ramesh Boinpally, Joel M. Trugman
article en

Abstract

This Phase 1 study of ubrogepant was conducted to establish the bioequivalence (BE) of the 50- and 100-mg to-be-marketed (TBM) tablet formulations with the clinical trial (CT) 100-mg tablet formulation and evaluate the food effect on the bioavailability of the 100-mg TBM tablet. This 2-part study enrolled healthy participants aged 18-45 years. Part A assessed BE following a single dose of TBM versus CT tablets. Part B evaluated the impact of a high-fat meal on ubrogepant pharmacokinetics. Safety and tolerability were assessed along with standard pharmacokinetic parameters. In Part A (n = 47), the geometric mean ratio and 90% confidence intervals for maximum plasma drug concentration, area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) from time zero to time t, and AUC from time zero to infinity for the TBM and CT formulations demonstrated BE. The time to peak exposure was the same for both formulations. In Part B (n = 18), a high-fat meal delayed time to peak exposure and reduced maximum plasma drug concentration by 22%, with no effect on AUC. The occurrence of treatment-emergent adverse events was low, and the majority were mild. Ubrogepant TBM and CT tablets (1 × 100 mg or 2 × 50 mg) were bioequivalent under fasted conditions, and a high-fat meal had no clinically relevant effect on the bioavailability of the TBM tablet formulation.

Clinical Pharmacology in Drug DevelopmentVol. 14(7)
AbbVie (United States) (US)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 86%
Pharmaceutical studies and practices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.